Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Keep Your Enemies Close: Vietnam’s Security Cooperation with China
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO25170 | Keep Your Enemies Close: Vietnam’s Security Cooperation with China
    Ian Seow Cheng Wei

    06 August 2025

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    Since 2006, Vietnam has engaged in security cooperation with China in the Gulf of Tonkin despite their ongoing territorial disputes in the South China Sea. Unlike the other claimants to islands in the South China Sea, why is Vietnam, which has a long history of conflicts with China, willing to do this?

    COMMENTARY

    According to the 2025 State of Southeast Asia Survey, nearly 68 per cent of respondents from Southeast Asian states expressed concern about China’s regional strategic and political influence over ongoing tensions in the South China Sea.

    It is therefore not surprising that the Philippines has deepened its military alliance with the US by accelerating the implementation of the Enhanced Defence Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) to facilitate American troop deployments responding to regional contingencies. Malaysia has procured used F-18 fighter jets from Kuwait and is constructing naval and air bases in Sabah and Sarawak to reinforce its claims in the South China Sea. Vietnam has also taken measures to defend its claims in the South China Sea through its island-building activities.

    Unlike the other South China Sea claimant states, Vietnam is more willing to engage in security cooperation with China. Since 2006, the two countries have conducted 37 joint naval patrols in the Gulf of Tonkin to address common non-traditional security challenges, including piracy and illegal fishing. Very recently, on 23 July 2025, they embarked on their first army-to-army joint exercises.

    In contrast, Malaysia has conducted only one joint naval exercise with China in 2015, while the Philippines has yet to participate in any such activities.

    It is pertinent to ask: Why is Vietnam more willing to participate in security cooperation activities with China, albeit on a limited basis, than other claimant states in the South China Sea?

    Vietnam’s Geographical Proximity to China

    For much of its history, Vietnam faced security challenges from China, including invasions and occupations during the Han and Ming Dynasties. In 1979, China invaded Vietnam following its signing of the 1978 Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation with the Soviet Union, which Beijing perceived as an alliance aimed at containing China. Vietnam’s history and China’s proximity were crucial in shaping Vietnam’s “Four Nos” defence policy – no military alliances, no use of or threat of force, no taking sides, and no hosting of foreign military bases.

    Although Hanoi has strengthened its defence relations with the US since 2008 to balance China’s assertiveness in the South China Sea, it remains cautious about expanding them too far to avoid portraying itself as aligned with China’s strategic rival. For instance, the Vietnam-US Naval Engagement Activity (NEA), conducted between 2010 and 2018, focused mainly on non-sensitive activities, such as Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief drills. By conducting joint naval patrols with China in the Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam demonstrates that it will not enter into a military alliance with the US to contain China.

    Moreover, the Vietnam-China joint patrols are useful avenues for building trust amidst the ongoing territorial disputes. Significantly, following the 2014 Haiyang Shiyou-981 incident, where China deployed an oil rig in Vietnam’s Exclusive Economic Zone, the latter did not cancel its joint patrols with China in the Gulf of Tonkin to avoid aggravating tensions. That same year, Hanoi and Beijing agreed to manage their outstanding territorial disputes in “a proper manner”.

    For China, its security cooperation with Vietnam plays a strategic role in managing regional dynamics while dividing potential adversaries. With tensions rising between Beijing and Manila in the South China Sea, China is less likely to escalate its disputes with Vietnam. Hence, Beijing has largely refrained from criticising Hanoi’s island-building activities in the South China Sea. Additionally, China uses its joint naval patrols with Vietnam to portray the Philippines as the intransigent actor in the region, thereby deflecting criticisms of its assertiveness.

    The Philippines’ reluctance to engage in security cooperation with China stems not only from its ongoing territorial disputes with China in the South China Sea but also from its longstanding alliance with the United States. As for Malaysia, although Kuala Lumpur has adopted a low-profile approach to the South China Sea dispute, its military remains concerned about Beijing’s encroachment into its territorial waters and airspace. For example, in 2021, Malaysia scrambled its fighter jets to intercept 16 Chinese military aircraft entering the airspace over disputed maritime areas off the coast of Sarawak. Such concerns limit Malaysia’s bilateral security cooperation with China.

    Maintaining Strong Party-to-Party Relations

    Unlike Malaysia and the Philippines, Vietnam has an ideology and governance system quite similar to China’s. In Vietnam’s history, China had been a source of literary, cultural, and political inspiration. The current structure of the Vietnamese Communist Party bears a close resemblance to that of the Chinese Communist Party.

    According to Vietnam’s foreign policy doctrine of “struggling while cooperating”, Hanoi views Beijing as an “object of struggle” in the South China Sea. It is also an “object of cooperation” in maintaining regime security. Following the end of the Cold War in 1991, Vietnam and China were concerned about colour revolutions, prompting both countries to normalise their bilateral relations and cooperate in managing domestic security threats.

    Thus, by engaging in security cooperation with China, Vietnam can maintain cordial relations with Beijing at the party-to-party level. Recently, in April 2025, China’s Defence Minister Dong Jun and Vietnam’s Defence Minister Phan Van Giang observed joint naval patrols in the Gulf of Tonkin in fulfilment of the China-Vietnam Border Defence Friendship Exchange. Subsequently, Vietnam praised these activities as a “testament to the determination of the two parties, states, and peoples to nurture the traditional Vietnam-China friendship”.

    Conclusion

    Vietnam’s history of tensions with China and its geographical proximity to China make it more agreeable to security cooperation with China than Malaysia or the Philippines. As Sun-Tzu once wrote: Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

    However, Vietnam’s joint naval patrols with China remain largely symbolic because of their ongoing territorial disputes in the South China Sea. But Hanoi is unlikely to give up this security cooperation to maintain cordial relations with its giant neighbour.

    About the Author

    Ian Seow Cheng Wei is a Master of Philosophy student at the University of Oxford’s Department of Politics and International Relations. He was previously a research intern at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, and has an interest in China’s foreign and security policies, as well as ASEAN’s international relations.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    Since 2006, Vietnam has engaged in security cooperation with China in the Gulf of Tonkin despite their ongoing territorial disputes in the South China Sea. Unlike the other claimants to islands in the South China Sea, why is Vietnam, which has a long history of conflicts with China, willing to do this?

    COMMENTARY

    According to the 2025 State of Southeast Asia Survey, nearly 68 per cent of respondents from Southeast Asian states expressed concern about China’s regional strategic and political influence over ongoing tensions in the South China Sea.

    It is therefore not surprising that the Philippines has deepened its military alliance with the US by accelerating the implementation of the Enhanced Defence Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) to facilitate American troop deployments responding to regional contingencies. Malaysia has procured used F-18 fighter jets from Kuwait and is constructing naval and air bases in Sabah and Sarawak to reinforce its claims in the South China Sea. Vietnam has also taken measures to defend its claims in the South China Sea through its island-building activities.

    Unlike the other South China Sea claimant states, Vietnam is more willing to engage in security cooperation with China. Since 2006, the two countries have conducted 37 joint naval patrols in the Gulf of Tonkin to address common non-traditional security challenges, including piracy and illegal fishing. Very recently, on 23 July 2025, they embarked on their first army-to-army joint exercises.

    In contrast, Malaysia has conducted only one joint naval exercise with China in 2015, while the Philippines has yet to participate in any such activities.

    It is pertinent to ask: Why is Vietnam more willing to participate in security cooperation activities with China, albeit on a limited basis, than other claimant states in the South China Sea?

    Vietnam’s Geographical Proximity to China

    For much of its history, Vietnam faced security challenges from China, including invasions and occupations during the Han and Ming Dynasties. In 1979, China invaded Vietnam following its signing of the 1978 Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation with the Soviet Union, which Beijing perceived as an alliance aimed at containing China. Vietnam’s history and China’s proximity were crucial in shaping Vietnam’s “Four Nos” defence policy – no military alliances, no use of or threat of force, no taking sides, and no hosting of foreign military bases.

    Although Hanoi has strengthened its defence relations with the US since 2008 to balance China’s assertiveness in the South China Sea, it remains cautious about expanding them too far to avoid portraying itself as aligned with China’s strategic rival. For instance, the Vietnam-US Naval Engagement Activity (NEA), conducted between 2010 and 2018, focused mainly on non-sensitive activities, such as Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief drills. By conducting joint naval patrols with China in the Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam demonstrates that it will not enter into a military alliance with the US to contain China.

    Moreover, the Vietnam-China joint patrols are useful avenues for building trust amidst the ongoing territorial disputes. Significantly, following the 2014 Haiyang Shiyou-981 incident, where China deployed an oil rig in Vietnam’s Exclusive Economic Zone, the latter did not cancel its joint patrols with China in the Gulf of Tonkin to avoid aggravating tensions. That same year, Hanoi and Beijing agreed to manage their outstanding territorial disputes in “a proper manner”.

    For China, its security cooperation with Vietnam plays a strategic role in managing regional dynamics while dividing potential adversaries. With tensions rising between Beijing and Manila in the South China Sea, China is less likely to escalate its disputes with Vietnam. Hence, Beijing has largely refrained from criticising Hanoi’s island-building activities in the South China Sea. Additionally, China uses its joint naval patrols with Vietnam to portray the Philippines as the intransigent actor in the region, thereby deflecting criticisms of its assertiveness.

    The Philippines’ reluctance to engage in security cooperation with China stems not only from its ongoing territorial disputes with China in the South China Sea but also from its longstanding alliance with the United States. As for Malaysia, although Kuala Lumpur has adopted a low-profile approach to the South China Sea dispute, its military remains concerned about Beijing’s encroachment into its territorial waters and airspace. For example, in 2021, Malaysia scrambled its fighter jets to intercept 16 Chinese military aircraft entering the airspace over disputed maritime areas off the coast of Sarawak. Such concerns limit Malaysia’s bilateral security cooperation with China.

    Maintaining Strong Party-to-Party Relations

    Unlike Malaysia and the Philippines, Vietnam has an ideology and governance system quite similar to China’s. In Vietnam’s history, China had been a source of literary, cultural, and political inspiration. The current structure of the Vietnamese Communist Party bears a close resemblance to that of the Chinese Communist Party.

    According to Vietnam’s foreign policy doctrine of “struggling while cooperating”, Hanoi views Beijing as an “object of struggle” in the South China Sea. It is also an “object of cooperation” in maintaining regime security. Following the end of the Cold War in 1991, Vietnam and China were concerned about colour revolutions, prompting both countries to normalise their bilateral relations and cooperate in managing domestic security threats.

    Thus, by engaging in security cooperation with China, Vietnam can maintain cordial relations with Beijing at the party-to-party level. Recently, in April 2025, China’s Defence Minister Dong Jun and Vietnam’s Defence Minister Phan Van Giang observed joint naval patrols in the Gulf of Tonkin in fulfilment of the China-Vietnam Border Defence Friendship Exchange. Subsequently, Vietnam praised these activities as a “testament to the determination of the two parties, states, and peoples to nurture the traditional Vietnam-China friendship”.

    Conclusion

    Vietnam’s history of tensions with China and its geographical proximity to China make it more agreeable to security cooperation with China than Malaysia or the Philippines. As Sun-Tzu once wrote: Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

    However, Vietnam’s joint naval patrols with China remain largely symbolic because of their ongoing territorial disputes in the South China Sea. But Hanoi is unlikely to give up this security cooperation to maintain cordial relations with its giant neighbour.

    About the Author

    Ian Seow Cheng Wei is a Master of Philosophy student at the University of Oxford’s Department of Politics and International Relations. He was previously a research intern at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, and has an interest in China’s foreign and security policies, as well as ASEAN’s international relations.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info