Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Malaysian General Election: Cash, Campaigns and Candidates
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO22131 | Malaysian General Election: Cash, Campaigns and Candidates
    Aira Azhari

    14 December 2022

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    In Malaysia, the high cost of electoral campaigns means that candidates with limited access to resources face challenges in raising funds, hampering broader participation in politics. This commentary on election campaign funding draws largely upon field interviews with candidates from the Malaysian United Democratic Alliance (MUDA) and Parti Amanah Negara (Amanah).

    111512 COP22131 Malaysian General Election Cash Campaigns and Candidates
    Source: Freepik 

    COMMENTARY

    The results of Malaysia’s 15ᵗʰ General Election (GE15) saw Perikatan Nasional (PN) winning an unprecedented 74 seats (out of 222) in the Federal Parliament. Analysts and voters have wondered about the source of their political campaign funds. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim had asserted that PN funded its GE15 campaign through gaming companies. He alleged that a lot of money had been misappropriated when PN leader, Muhyiddin Yassin, was the country’s Prime Minister. (It has since been clarified that the amount in question is RM92.5 billion.)

    The deputy youth chief Wan Ahmad Fayhsal of Bersatu, a component party of PN, has refused to reveal the identity of PN’s donors, arguing that no party is required to do so by law. In response to Anwar’s allegation, the Ulama Wing Chief of the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS), another component party of PN, accused Pakatan Harapan (PH), chaired by Anwar, of receiving foreign funds itself.

    Much of the discussion on political finance regulation in Malaysia has focused on the need for transparency regarding funding sources and curbs on patronage and corruption. The 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) scandal, involving USD756 million, had been the main catalyst that sparked the debate to enact a Political Financing Act, although that proposed legislation remains elusive till today.

    What is not getting sufficient attention is the fact that running an election campaign is itself expensive. For candidates who do not have access to resources such as the personal, grassroots and business networks that established candidates may have, raising funds to get elected into political office is challenging.

    What Candidates Spend on During Campaigns

    Minimally, every candidate competing in an election must pay deposits to two entities. Firstly, the candidate needs to pay a deposit to the local council – RM5,000 for a parliamentary seat and RM3,000 for a state seat – to put up posters, flags and banners, etc., which need to be taken down within two weeks after the election. Secondly, the candidate needs to pay a deposit to the Election Commission of Malaysia – RM10,000 for a parliamentary seat and RM5,000 for a State Assembly seat. The candidate would need to win at least 1/8 of the total votes cast in the contested constituency in order not to lose the deposit.

    In reality, a serious campaign requires far more financial outlay than these deposits. The most visible is in the printing and placement of flags, buntings and posters. One respondent revealed that his campaign printed 22,000 flags, 10,000 posters and 40 billboard advertisements. Costs also need to be incurred in renting office spaces, and in hiring staff; even volunteers need to be provided with meals at the very least.

    Candidates also pay for the hiring and training of Polling and Counting Agents (PACAs). They provide their own PACAs at every polling station where they contested, some having to mobilise as many as 300 PACAs who worked in shifts to cover the full day. Respondents revealed that they paid between RM50-100 for each PACA, but due to lack of funds, some had to make do with the same people doubling up for both polling and counting work from morning until late evening.

    Some political parties provided a basic level of support through “candidate packages” which consisted of payments for deposits and quantities of flags, posters and miscellaneous items, which were not always sufficient, hence, forcing candidates in some instances to raise more funds to print more flags. Transportation was another cost item as many voters expected the party they supported to provide transport to the polling station.

    Such campaign costs are taken in stride by more established candidates, but they can be prohibitive for new candidates with little or no resources of their own. This confers a degree of advantage to established parties and candidates, while raising barriers for others participating in frontline politics.

    How Parties Financed their Campaigns

    Campaign costs are burdensome for all parties and candidates, but some are better able to afford them than others.

    Component parties of Barisan Nasional (BN), which had held power for more than six decades, have traditionally received funding support from their vast networks of businesses, owned by either the parties themselves, individuals within the parties, or proxies of the parties.

    As for PH parties, they have historically raised funds through fundraising dinners, donations during rallies, contributions from elected representatives, and the sale of merchandise.

    For PAS, voluntary monthly contributions from their members have been significant. The party had also tried out a co-operative business model in the form of Koperasi Al-Hilal Malaysia Berhad (Kohilal), where the profits were used to fund the party’s political activities. The venture ended in failure.

    MUDA and Amanah candidates who were interviewed relied upon a combination of methods such as fundraising dinners, online crowdfunding, and personal donations from family and close friends. Online crowdfunding was generally not effective as most of these candidates only managed to raise an average of approximately RM2,000 each.

    MUDA supported their candidates with the basic candidate packages mentioned earlier, while Amanah helped only those candidates who were truly in need. Although Amanah is a component party of PH, monetary support for candidates’ campaigns came from the party, not the coalition.

    Personal donations seemed to have been the main source of campaign funds for all the candidates interviewed. It was noted that the amounts raised depended highly on the personality of the candidates themselves. For example, candidates who have built incumbency advantage through their time holding political offices previously might find it easier to raise funds for their campaigns than others.

    Indeed, the only two candidates who won (out of seven interviewed), held some incumbency advantage through previous political positions in both federal and state governments. In fact, the presence of such personalities was said to be helpful at their fellow colleagues’ ‘pitching sessions’ for funds. This reliance on high-profile personalities is not new in Malaysian politics and is amplified in new parties where resources are still largely tied to their most prominent leaders.

    Lastly, being young or new does not necessarily mean that a candidate would have poor access to funds. With support from their parties, many young and new candidates ran well-funded campaigns. On the other hand, there were others, particularly independent candidates, who lacked access to well-heeled backers.

    Conclusion

    Campaign financing is just the tip of the iceberg in the funding of year-round political activities in Malaysia. While the proposed Political Financing Act (PFA) would help to curb political corruption, it would not necessarily make participation in politics less expensive. The PFA should consider Malaysia’s personality-based political financing practices and go further to propose more sustainable solutions, such as a public funding model for political parties, to enable more equitable funding and participation in politics.

    About the Author

    Aira Azhari is Senior Manager of the Democracy and Governance Unit at the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS), Malaysia. This commentary is part of RSIS Malaysia Programme’s project on the Malaysian General Election.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / General / Conflict and Stability / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    In Malaysia, the high cost of electoral campaigns means that candidates with limited access to resources face challenges in raising funds, hampering broader participation in politics. This commentary on election campaign funding draws largely upon field interviews with candidates from the Malaysian United Democratic Alliance (MUDA) and Parti Amanah Negara (Amanah).

    111512 COP22131 Malaysian General Election Cash Campaigns and Candidates
    Source: Freepik 

    COMMENTARY

    The results of Malaysia’s 15ᵗʰ General Election (GE15) saw Perikatan Nasional (PN) winning an unprecedented 74 seats (out of 222) in the Federal Parliament. Analysts and voters have wondered about the source of their political campaign funds. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim had asserted that PN funded its GE15 campaign through gaming companies. He alleged that a lot of money had been misappropriated when PN leader, Muhyiddin Yassin, was the country’s Prime Minister. (It has since been clarified that the amount in question is RM92.5 billion.)

    The deputy youth chief Wan Ahmad Fayhsal of Bersatu, a component party of PN, has refused to reveal the identity of PN’s donors, arguing that no party is required to do so by law. In response to Anwar’s allegation, the Ulama Wing Chief of the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS), another component party of PN, accused Pakatan Harapan (PH), chaired by Anwar, of receiving foreign funds itself.

    Much of the discussion on political finance regulation in Malaysia has focused on the need for transparency regarding funding sources and curbs on patronage and corruption. The 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) scandal, involving USD756 million, had been the main catalyst that sparked the debate to enact a Political Financing Act, although that proposed legislation remains elusive till today.

    What is not getting sufficient attention is the fact that running an election campaign is itself expensive. For candidates who do not have access to resources such as the personal, grassroots and business networks that established candidates may have, raising funds to get elected into political office is challenging.

    What Candidates Spend on During Campaigns

    Minimally, every candidate competing in an election must pay deposits to two entities. Firstly, the candidate needs to pay a deposit to the local council – RM5,000 for a parliamentary seat and RM3,000 for a state seat – to put up posters, flags and banners, etc., which need to be taken down within two weeks after the election. Secondly, the candidate needs to pay a deposit to the Election Commission of Malaysia – RM10,000 for a parliamentary seat and RM5,000 for a State Assembly seat. The candidate would need to win at least 1/8 of the total votes cast in the contested constituency in order not to lose the deposit.

    In reality, a serious campaign requires far more financial outlay than these deposits. The most visible is in the printing and placement of flags, buntings and posters. One respondent revealed that his campaign printed 22,000 flags, 10,000 posters and 40 billboard advertisements. Costs also need to be incurred in renting office spaces, and in hiring staff; even volunteers need to be provided with meals at the very least.

    Candidates also pay for the hiring and training of Polling and Counting Agents (PACAs). They provide their own PACAs at every polling station where they contested, some having to mobilise as many as 300 PACAs who worked in shifts to cover the full day. Respondents revealed that they paid between RM50-100 for each PACA, but due to lack of funds, some had to make do with the same people doubling up for both polling and counting work from morning until late evening.

    Some political parties provided a basic level of support through “candidate packages” which consisted of payments for deposits and quantities of flags, posters and miscellaneous items, which were not always sufficient, hence, forcing candidates in some instances to raise more funds to print more flags. Transportation was another cost item as many voters expected the party they supported to provide transport to the polling station.

    Such campaign costs are taken in stride by more established candidates, but they can be prohibitive for new candidates with little or no resources of their own. This confers a degree of advantage to established parties and candidates, while raising barriers for others participating in frontline politics.

    How Parties Financed their Campaigns

    Campaign costs are burdensome for all parties and candidates, but some are better able to afford them than others.

    Component parties of Barisan Nasional (BN), which had held power for more than six decades, have traditionally received funding support from their vast networks of businesses, owned by either the parties themselves, individuals within the parties, or proxies of the parties.

    As for PH parties, they have historically raised funds through fundraising dinners, donations during rallies, contributions from elected representatives, and the sale of merchandise.

    For PAS, voluntary monthly contributions from their members have been significant. The party had also tried out a co-operative business model in the form of Koperasi Al-Hilal Malaysia Berhad (Kohilal), where the profits were used to fund the party’s political activities. The venture ended in failure.

    MUDA and Amanah candidates who were interviewed relied upon a combination of methods such as fundraising dinners, online crowdfunding, and personal donations from family and close friends. Online crowdfunding was generally not effective as most of these candidates only managed to raise an average of approximately RM2,000 each.

    MUDA supported their candidates with the basic candidate packages mentioned earlier, while Amanah helped only those candidates who were truly in need. Although Amanah is a component party of PH, monetary support for candidates’ campaigns came from the party, not the coalition.

    Personal donations seemed to have been the main source of campaign funds for all the candidates interviewed. It was noted that the amounts raised depended highly on the personality of the candidates themselves. For example, candidates who have built incumbency advantage through their time holding political offices previously might find it easier to raise funds for their campaigns than others.

    Indeed, the only two candidates who won (out of seven interviewed), held some incumbency advantage through previous political positions in both federal and state governments. In fact, the presence of such personalities was said to be helpful at their fellow colleagues’ ‘pitching sessions’ for funds. This reliance on high-profile personalities is not new in Malaysian politics and is amplified in new parties where resources are still largely tied to their most prominent leaders.

    Lastly, being young or new does not necessarily mean that a candidate would have poor access to funds. With support from their parties, many young and new candidates ran well-funded campaigns. On the other hand, there were others, particularly independent candidates, who lacked access to well-heeled backers.

    Conclusion

    Campaign financing is just the tip of the iceberg in the funding of year-round political activities in Malaysia. While the proposed Political Financing Act (PFA) would help to curb political corruption, it would not necessarily make participation in politics less expensive. The PFA should consider Malaysia’s personality-based political financing practices and go further to propose more sustainable solutions, such as a public funding model for political parties, to enable more equitable funding and participation in politics.

    About the Author

    Aira Azhari is Senior Manager of the Democracy and Governance Unit at the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS), Malaysia. This commentary is part of RSIS Malaysia Programme’s project on the Malaysian General Election.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / General / Conflict and Stability / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info