Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Post-GE14: Decentralising Federal-Selangor Governance
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO19032 | Post-GE14: Decentralising Federal-Selangor Governance
    Prashant Waikar

    01 March 2019

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    Since GE14, the Selangor state government’s relations with the Pakatan Harapan federal government have improved but there are calls for governance to be further decentralised.

    COMMENTARY

    PAKATAN HARAPAN’s (PH) election victory on 9 May 2018 marks a potential turning point for federal-state relations in Malaysia. Whereas state governments controlled by the predecessor Pakatan Rakyat coalition often complained of having a testy relationship with the then Barisan Nasional (BN) federal government, PH states should expect greater ideological and policy compatibility with the centre now that it controls federal power too.

    To assess the extent to which federal-state relations can be expected to evolve, it would be useful to compare and contrast the relationship between the state governments previously under PR (and now PH) and the BN federal government with the relationship they currently have with the PH federal government now in power. Against this backdrop, it would be instructive to assess the possibilities of greater decentralisation. As PR held Selangor for 10 years prior to GE14, it serves as an appropriate case study.

    Relations with BN: Combative but Pragmatic

    After losing Selangor to PR in 2008, BN was bent on regaining control of the state, which is Malaysia’s wealthiest. In 2018, it contributed 23% of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). BN’s approach towards reclaiming Selangor was politically combative.

    After both the 2008 and 2013 elections, BN refused to name a leader of the opposition. Nor was it willing to substantively participate in state-level select committees or to debate policy issues constructively.

    Additionally, the BN federal government used the Implementation Coordination Unit (ICU), which operates out of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), to run a parallel administrative system with the aim of outperforming and thus discrediting the PR state government.

    At the same time, BN approached its economic relations with Selangor pragmatically. The then-Minister of International Trade and Industry, Mustapa Mohamed, however, established a good working relationship with his counterparts in Selangor. He frequently brought representatives from Selangor on overseas missions to attract investments.

    The then-Tourism Minister Nazri Aziz also promoted Selangor as a tourist destination actively. BN’s economically pragmatic approach was perhaps not surprising given the important economic role played by Selangor. It can be averred that BN’s strategy was to make PR (and PH subsequently) appear inept at administration without disrupting economic activity.

    Relations with PH Centre: Friendly

    Since the GE14, many members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) from PH in Selangor have acknowledged an improved working relationship with the new federal government, given that both are on the same side.

    The ideological and policy objectives of the state and federal governments are also aligned. Issues that were stalemated between Selangor and the then-BN federal government have since been resolved.

    That said, it is worth noting that the Selangor state government has a number of items on its wish list that it would like to see addressed. Most significant is a wish for greater control of finances. Currently, state governments are not allowed to raise supplementary funding through instruments such as government bonds.

    Many MLAs wish to see an increase in the share of tax revenues. Whereas Selangor contributes over 20% of nationwide tax revenues to the federal government, it receives less than 0.5% of these revenues once the federal government re-allocates them. The counter-argument, though, is that if disproportionately more revenues are given to Selangor, this would eat into development funds available for other states.

    Selangor the Pace Setter

    The worry for the federal government, regardless of which coalition is in control, is that other states would be unable to ‘catch up’ with Selangor, which is by far the country’s most developed state. Still, the Selangor state government’s concerns should be explored more deeply.

    Selangor’s state budget for 2019 is RM2.56 billion. The Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) budget for 2019 is RM2.89 bn. Selangor’s budget is smaller even though it is 33 times bigger and has a population that is 3.6 times larger than KL. The disproportion lends credence to Selangor MLAs’ wish to see greater autonomy over financial control.

    In their view, should this happen, the state government would be able to study the possibilities of pursuing other areas which they believe they should be administering such as health care, transport and primary education.

    Differentiated Decentralisation, with Caveats

    The goal of devolving powers is to make governance more efficient. Compared to the federal government, state governments would generally possess a better understanding of state-level administrative issues. Redistributing non-sensitive responsibilities such as transportation and primary healthcare would likely strengthen the model of federalism in Malaysia.

    First, since Selangor is better developed than other states, its aspirations and requirements cannot be used as a yardstick for decentralising governance across Malaysia. Poorer and smaller states such as Perlis, for instance, would struggle without sufficient federal assistance.

    Second, if in the future, the federal government changes hands again, what would that mean for decentralisation? Would the new federal government turn back the clock?

    That is a question for the future but for now, the federal government should consider studying the prospects of implementing a differentiated system of decentralisation that accounts for the varied capabilities of each state.

    About the Author

    Prashant Waikar is a Research Analyst with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU). This is part of a series on Malaysia’s Changing Federal-State Relations.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    Since GE14, the Selangor state government’s relations with the Pakatan Harapan federal government have improved but there are calls for governance to be further decentralised.

    COMMENTARY

    PAKATAN HARAPAN’s (PH) election victory on 9 May 2018 marks a potential turning point for federal-state relations in Malaysia. Whereas state governments controlled by the predecessor Pakatan Rakyat coalition often complained of having a testy relationship with the then Barisan Nasional (BN) federal government, PH states should expect greater ideological and policy compatibility with the centre now that it controls federal power too.

    To assess the extent to which federal-state relations can be expected to evolve, it would be useful to compare and contrast the relationship between the state governments previously under PR (and now PH) and the BN federal government with the relationship they currently have with the PH federal government now in power. Against this backdrop, it would be instructive to assess the possibilities of greater decentralisation. As PR held Selangor for 10 years prior to GE14, it serves as an appropriate case study.

    Relations with BN: Combative but Pragmatic

    After losing Selangor to PR in 2008, BN was bent on regaining control of the state, which is Malaysia’s wealthiest. In 2018, it contributed 23% of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). BN’s approach towards reclaiming Selangor was politically combative.

    After both the 2008 and 2013 elections, BN refused to name a leader of the opposition. Nor was it willing to substantively participate in state-level select committees or to debate policy issues constructively.

    Additionally, the BN federal government used the Implementation Coordination Unit (ICU), which operates out of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), to run a parallel administrative system with the aim of outperforming and thus discrediting the PR state government.

    At the same time, BN approached its economic relations with Selangor pragmatically. The then-Minister of International Trade and Industry, Mustapa Mohamed, however, established a good working relationship with his counterparts in Selangor. He frequently brought representatives from Selangor on overseas missions to attract investments.

    The then-Tourism Minister Nazri Aziz also promoted Selangor as a tourist destination actively. BN’s economically pragmatic approach was perhaps not surprising given the important economic role played by Selangor. It can be averred that BN’s strategy was to make PR (and PH subsequently) appear inept at administration without disrupting economic activity.

    Relations with PH Centre: Friendly

    Since the GE14, many members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) from PH in Selangor have acknowledged an improved working relationship with the new federal government, given that both are on the same side.

    The ideological and policy objectives of the state and federal governments are also aligned. Issues that were stalemated between Selangor and the then-BN federal government have since been resolved.

    That said, it is worth noting that the Selangor state government has a number of items on its wish list that it would like to see addressed. Most significant is a wish for greater control of finances. Currently, state governments are not allowed to raise supplementary funding through instruments such as government bonds.

    Many MLAs wish to see an increase in the share of tax revenues. Whereas Selangor contributes over 20% of nationwide tax revenues to the federal government, it receives less than 0.5% of these revenues once the federal government re-allocates them. The counter-argument, though, is that if disproportionately more revenues are given to Selangor, this would eat into development funds available for other states.

    Selangor the Pace Setter

    The worry for the federal government, regardless of which coalition is in control, is that other states would be unable to ‘catch up’ with Selangor, which is by far the country’s most developed state. Still, the Selangor state government’s concerns should be explored more deeply.

    Selangor’s state budget for 2019 is RM2.56 billion. The Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) budget for 2019 is RM2.89 bn. Selangor’s budget is smaller even though it is 33 times bigger and has a population that is 3.6 times larger than KL. The disproportion lends credence to Selangor MLAs’ wish to see greater autonomy over financial control.

    In their view, should this happen, the state government would be able to study the possibilities of pursuing other areas which they believe they should be administering such as health care, transport and primary education.

    Differentiated Decentralisation, with Caveats

    The goal of devolving powers is to make governance more efficient. Compared to the federal government, state governments would generally possess a better understanding of state-level administrative issues. Redistributing non-sensitive responsibilities such as transportation and primary healthcare would likely strengthen the model of federalism in Malaysia.

    First, since Selangor is better developed than other states, its aspirations and requirements cannot be used as a yardstick for decentralising governance across Malaysia. Poorer and smaller states such as Perlis, for instance, would struggle without sufficient federal assistance.

    Second, if in the future, the federal government changes hands again, what would that mean for decentralisation? Would the new federal government turn back the clock?

    That is a question for the future but for now, the federal government should consider studying the prospects of implementing a differentiated system of decentralisation that accounts for the varied capabilities of each state.

    About the Author

    Prashant Waikar is a Research Analyst with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU). This is part of a series on Malaysia’s Changing Federal-State Relations.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info