Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Masculinity Among Indonesian Militants
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO21141 | Masculinity Among Indonesian Militants
    Noor Huda Ismail

    22 September 2021

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    The path into and out of extremism is influenced by various factors. One under-researched factor is the role of masculinity ─ how manhood and its accompanying sense of perceived responsibility drive individuals to resort to violence. How valid is this argument?


    Source: pxhere

    COMMENTARY

    INDONESIAN MILITANTS often frame their participation in violent groups like Jamaah Islamiyah (JI) or Jamaah Ansharut Daulah (JAD) in masculine tropes ─ as protectors, warriors, or brothers. Such ‘masculinity’ often drives them towards a sense of perceived responsibility to defend the ummah.

    At the same time, their pathways out of violent groups are also defined by their ability to recraft and negotiate their new masculinity to one that is less toxic in society. Existing work on radicalisation and de-radicalisation will not be sufficient without seriously considering the role of masculinity. One way to further understand the possible relationship between masculinity and violent groups is to study the lived experiences of former or reformed militants.

    The Case of Syahrul Munif

    Syahrul Munif, 40, is a returned Indonesian IS fighter. His life history should not be taken to represent all experiences of Indonesian militants but to highlight how context shapes one’s masculinity that eventually influences one to join and leave violent groups.

    The selection of Syahrul from the network of Indonesian foreign fighters is due to its significance to the region and growing impact globally of Indonesian foreign fighters. They have fostered other violent movements across Southeast Asia (particularly in Malaysia, Singapore, and The Philippines), and have well-established networks originating from the Darul Islam (DI) rebellion in the mid-20th century.

    Furthermore, Indonesian fighters have participated in conflicts across the globe ranging from Afghanistan in the 1980s to recent struggles in Syria. Many of them have now taken up new roles within violent networks in the region.

    These include serving as military trainers, financiers, recruiters, advisors and even as participants in ongoing violence or attacks. Additionally, their previous experiences often enhance their capacity to commit acts of violence and can provide focal points for organising those who failed to do ‘hijrah’ to Syria ─ to join the jihad there.

    No Radical History or Background

    Unlike many Indonesian men who became foreign fighters, Syahrul does not come from a community with a strong JI influence. Instead, he was a member of the largest Islamic organisation, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), in East Java that often adopts a principled position of moderation on issues. As a young man he was actively involved in NU, he felt constantly confronted by ‘a glass ceiling’ because he did not come from ‘blue blood’ NU family.

    After graduating from high school, he went to a local university to study law. Through his passion for Islamic activism while studying between 2000 until 2004, he became a student leader. This activism gave him a sense of meaning and belonging as a man to a group that has social standing in the society.

    Mingling with Islamic activists in Malang, East Java, allowed him to attend Islamic sermons at a local mosque by an ustad, Abu Bakar Ba’asyir, who was then the senior leader in Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia (MMI). This was a jihadi organisation led by Ba’asyir whose sermons deepened Syahrul’s commitment to the Islamic cause.

    When there was a split within MMI and Ba’asyir left to establish a new jihadi group called Jamaat Ansharut Tauhid (JAT), Syahrul followed. But Syahrul quickly left JAT because he did not see any ‘concrete action’ by JAT to respond the challenges faced by Muslims globally. As a man, he needed that ‘action’ partly to demonstrate one’s commitment to Islam.

    Need For ‘Concrete Action’

    After leaving JAT, Syahrul met with an IS recruiter, Abu Jandal, an Indonesian of Yemeni descent who offered him opportunities for ‘concrete action’. “We must help our oppressed brothers and sisters. Moreover, you will get paid and can always come back home once the mission has been accomplished,” Abu Jandal said.  Syahrul was very motivated to go when the recruiter said he could always come home after the mission.

    When Syahrul was in Syria with IS, he soon felt uncomfortable to see the brutality of the group. Although he had agreed with the idea of defending the oppressed, he was disillusioned by IS’ broken promises and their unIslamic ways such as beheadings. More importantly, he also felt guilty about lying to his parents and wife regarding his departure to Syria.

    This was something very emotional for him as he would have brought him to tears by it during the interview. After six months, Syahrul decided to travel back to Indonesia and then arrested by the Indonesian authority.

    Recrafting and Negotiating Masculinity

    Inside the prison, Syahrul reflected his harsh experience with IS that had seriously challenged his pre-existing ideas about masculinity as not emphasising violence. He admitted that when he became a student activist, he held hard-line religious ideals. But while he valorised men who could forward ‘concrete action’, it did not mean he championed violence. In this regard, understanding the subtle diversity of gendered performances of masculinity among the Indonesian militants is critical.

    After three years in prison, Syahrul needed time to adapt back to normal life ─ his work, family, the local community, and Indonesian society. It was at this crucial time that he met Arif Tuban – a reformed convicted terrorist who was running a community website, www.ruangobrol.id.

    Arif encouraged and provided an opportunity for Syahrul to become a guest speaker in various prevention activities, including with the national counter-terrorism agency. Arif also helped Syahrul to restore his reputation in the community by introducing him to the local police and involving him in joint deradicalisation assistance activities.

    Need for Wider Research

    In retrospect, Syahrul’s commitment to the jihadi network came through a desire for leadership (which he did not find in NU) and the desire to do good (through humanitarian work). It also demonstrates that joining and leaving violent groups could be a highly gendered process.

    Thus, without incorporating masculinity perspective such as acknowledging the struggles of men with social status, employment and the family, any work on radicalisation and deradicalisation will not be sufficient. But how valid is the argument that masculinity drives radicalism?

    More research needs to be done to determine this conclusively. A larger number of participants in the research would in turn allow for more robust findings. The end result could be the potential to transform the traditional way of dealing with the issue of violent extremism not only in Indonesia but also in the region.

    About the Author

    Noor Huda Ismail is Visiting Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. He is also the founder of an award-winning community website, www.ruangobrol.id to amplify the role of credible voice of reformed terrorists in Indonesia.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Conflict and Stability / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / Religion in Contemporary Society / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    The path into and out of extremism is influenced by various factors. One under-researched factor is the role of masculinity ─ how manhood and its accompanying sense of perceived responsibility drive individuals to resort to violence. How valid is this argument?


    Source: pxhere

    COMMENTARY

    INDONESIAN MILITANTS often frame their participation in violent groups like Jamaah Islamiyah (JI) or Jamaah Ansharut Daulah (JAD) in masculine tropes ─ as protectors, warriors, or brothers. Such ‘masculinity’ often drives them towards a sense of perceived responsibility to defend the ummah.

    At the same time, their pathways out of violent groups are also defined by their ability to recraft and negotiate their new masculinity to one that is less toxic in society. Existing work on radicalisation and de-radicalisation will not be sufficient without seriously considering the role of masculinity. One way to further understand the possible relationship between masculinity and violent groups is to study the lived experiences of former or reformed militants.

    The Case of Syahrul Munif

    Syahrul Munif, 40, is a returned Indonesian IS fighter. His life history should not be taken to represent all experiences of Indonesian militants but to highlight how context shapes one’s masculinity that eventually influences one to join and leave violent groups.

    The selection of Syahrul from the network of Indonesian foreign fighters is due to its significance to the region and growing impact globally of Indonesian foreign fighters. They have fostered other violent movements across Southeast Asia (particularly in Malaysia, Singapore, and The Philippines), and have well-established networks originating from the Darul Islam (DI) rebellion in the mid-20th century.

    Furthermore, Indonesian fighters have participated in conflicts across the globe ranging from Afghanistan in the 1980s to recent struggles in Syria. Many of them have now taken up new roles within violent networks in the region.

    These include serving as military trainers, financiers, recruiters, advisors and even as participants in ongoing violence or attacks. Additionally, their previous experiences often enhance their capacity to commit acts of violence and can provide focal points for organising those who failed to do ‘hijrah’ to Syria ─ to join the jihad there.

    No Radical History or Background

    Unlike many Indonesian men who became foreign fighters, Syahrul does not come from a community with a strong JI influence. Instead, he was a member of the largest Islamic organisation, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), in East Java that often adopts a principled position of moderation on issues. As a young man he was actively involved in NU, he felt constantly confronted by ‘a glass ceiling’ because he did not come from ‘blue blood’ NU family.

    After graduating from high school, he went to a local university to study law. Through his passion for Islamic activism while studying between 2000 until 2004, he became a student leader. This activism gave him a sense of meaning and belonging as a man to a group that has social standing in the society.

    Mingling with Islamic activists in Malang, East Java, allowed him to attend Islamic sermons at a local mosque by an ustad, Abu Bakar Ba’asyir, who was then the senior leader in Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia (MMI). This was a jihadi organisation led by Ba’asyir whose sermons deepened Syahrul’s commitment to the Islamic cause.

    When there was a split within MMI and Ba’asyir left to establish a new jihadi group called Jamaat Ansharut Tauhid (JAT), Syahrul followed. But Syahrul quickly left JAT because he did not see any ‘concrete action’ by JAT to respond the challenges faced by Muslims globally. As a man, he needed that ‘action’ partly to demonstrate one’s commitment to Islam.

    Need For ‘Concrete Action’

    After leaving JAT, Syahrul met with an IS recruiter, Abu Jandal, an Indonesian of Yemeni descent who offered him opportunities for ‘concrete action’. “We must help our oppressed brothers and sisters. Moreover, you will get paid and can always come back home once the mission has been accomplished,” Abu Jandal said.  Syahrul was very motivated to go when the recruiter said he could always come home after the mission.

    When Syahrul was in Syria with IS, he soon felt uncomfortable to see the brutality of the group. Although he had agreed with the idea of defending the oppressed, he was disillusioned by IS’ broken promises and their unIslamic ways such as beheadings. More importantly, he also felt guilty about lying to his parents and wife regarding his departure to Syria.

    This was something very emotional for him as he would have brought him to tears by it during the interview. After six months, Syahrul decided to travel back to Indonesia and then arrested by the Indonesian authority.

    Recrafting and Negotiating Masculinity

    Inside the prison, Syahrul reflected his harsh experience with IS that had seriously challenged his pre-existing ideas about masculinity as not emphasising violence. He admitted that when he became a student activist, he held hard-line religious ideals. But while he valorised men who could forward ‘concrete action’, it did not mean he championed violence. In this regard, understanding the subtle diversity of gendered performances of masculinity among the Indonesian militants is critical.

    After three years in prison, Syahrul needed time to adapt back to normal life ─ his work, family, the local community, and Indonesian society. It was at this crucial time that he met Arif Tuban – a reformed convicted terrorist who was running a community website, www.ruangobrol.id.

    Arif encouraged and provided an opportunity for Syahrul to become a guest speaker in various prevention activities, including with the national counter-terrorism agency. Arif also helped Syahrul to restore his reputation in the community by introducing him to the local police and involving him in joint deradicalisation assistance activities.

    Need for Wider Research

    In retrospect, Syahrul’s commitment to the jihadi network came through a desire for leadership (which he did not find in NU) and the desire to do good (through humanitarian work). It also demonstrates that joining and leaving violent groups could be a highly gendered process.

    Thus, without incorporating masculinity perspective such as acknowledging the struggles of men with social status, employment and the family, any work on radicalisation and deradicalisation will not be sufficient. But how valid is the argument that masculinity drives radicalism?

    More research needs to be done to determine this conclusively. A larger number of participants in the research would in turn allow for more robust findings. The end result could be the potential to transform the traditional way of dealing with the issue of violent extremism not only in Indonesia but also in the region.

    About the Author

    Noor Huda Ismail is Visiting Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. He is also the founder of an award-winning community website, www.ruangobrol.id to amplify the role of credible voice of reformed terrorists in Indonesia.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Conflict and Stability / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / Religion in Contemporary Society

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info