Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • New Caledonia: An Uncertain Geopolitical Future Amid France’s Indo-Pacific Strategy
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO23124 | New Caledonia: An Uncertain Geopolitical Future Amid France’s Indo-Pacific Strategy
    Paco Milhiet

    31 August 2023

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    French President Emmanuel Macron’s visit to New Caledonia – a Pacific Ocean archipelago still under French sovereignty – was largely dedicated to local political issues. The results of the three referendums held between 2018 and 2021 to settle the political status of the territory have not been accepted by those in favour of independence. The growing political tensions in New Caledonia could have a negative impact on France’s Indo-Pacific strategy.

    COMMENTARY

    French President Emmanuel Macron visited New Caledonia from 24-26 July 2023 for the second time during his presidency as part of a trip that also took in Vanuatu (27 July) and Papua New Guinea (28 July). Five years earlier, in 2018, it was from New Caledonia that he implemented an Indo-Pacific strategy and clarified the role that the territory was to play regarding France’s new geopolitical ambition.

    Macron’s strategy for the French Indo-Pacific was to legitimise and enhance French assets in the region. The exercise of sovereignty in the overseas collectivities of the Indo-Pacific is a central component of the new narrative implemented by France. However, this geopolitical narrative is likely to be undermined by domestic political imperatives in New Caledonia.

    Indeed, this French territory of 18,600 sq km in Melanesia is a cornerstone of French strategy in the region. Strategically located in the Southwest Pacific astride a region facing growing US-China rivalry, it is the world’s fourth largest producer of nickel.

    New Caledonia lies 1,200 km east of Australia and 1,500 km north of New Zealand (see map from author’s personal drawing). Inhabited by Melanesian populations, mostly Kanaks, for more than 3,000 years, it was discovered by the British navigator James Cook in 1774 but proclaimed French in 1853, amid growing religious and political competition between European powers in the region.

    Unfinished Decolonisation Process

    Like Australia under the British, New Caledonia was first used by the French colonial power as a penitentiary settlement. With successive waves of immigration by European and Asian settlers (mostly Vietnamese and Indonesians) and the scourge of diseases, wars, and alcoholism, the Kanaks found themselves rapidly marginalised in their homeland.

    After living through discrimination and land spoliation under the colonial authority, the Kanak people gradually gained access to civil rights after the Second World War. However, they remained largely on the margins of economic development. The succession of independence in the Pacific region granted to the Samoa Islands (1962), Nauru (1968), Fiji and Tonga (1970), the Solomon Islands (1975), and Vanuatu (1980) led to cultural and nationalist claims by the Kanak people under the leadership of Jean-Marie Tjibaou.

    From 1984 to 1988, the political situation in New Caledonia deteriorated into a civil war, reaching a climax in 1988 when four French policemen were assassinated by independence activists, and 26 were taken hostage on the island of Ouvéa. An operation to free the hostages was carried out by the French army, causing the death of 19 pro-independence militants and two French soldiers.

    French Prime Minister Michel Rocard’s mediation resulted in the signing of the Matignon Agreements in June 1988, which established a 10-year transitional statute. The following year, Jean-Marie Tjibaou, the pro-independence leader who was a signatory to the Matignon Agreements, was assassinated by a Kanak extremist. In May 1998, the transitional statute was extended by another 20 years with the signing of the Nouméa Accord, which provided for an independence referendum in 2018 and an economic transfer to the Kanak communities.

    As for its international status, New Caledonia was recognised under UN Resolution 4141 as a non-self-governing territory, an explicit recognition of its unfinished decolonisation process.

    Three Referendums, Two Opposing Societies

    The year 2018 was crucial as the 30-year transitory period initiated during the Matignon Agreements in 1988 had come to an end. The population had to vote for its political future. The referendum question was simple: “Do you want New Caledonia to gain full sovereignty and become independent?”

    According to French constitutional law, if the answer was negative, further referendums could be organised every two years, up to a maximum of three such public votes. As it turned out, 56.67 per cent of the people voted against independence in 2018. In the second referendum in 2020, 53.26 per cent of the people again voted “No” to independence.

    As for the third referendum held on 12 December 2021, the main pro-independence parties had called for a boycott because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The result of the referendum – 96.50 per cent against independence – was therefore tainted by massive abstentions, with only 41.87 per cent of the electorate voting.

    Independence Referendums in New Caledonia:
    “Do you want New Caledonia to gain full sovereignty and become independent?”

    Yes No Participation
    1st referendum: 4/11/2018 43.33% 56.67% 81.01%
    2nd referendum: 4/10/2020 46.74% 53.26% 85.69%
    3rd referendum: 12/12/2021 3.50% 96.50% 41.87%

    The referendum process which was intended to lead to a consensual evolution of the statutes for or against independence now foreshadowed the beginning of a political confrontation. The pro-independence parties had already challenged the result of the third referendum and brought it before international organisations, including the UN, Pacific Islands Forum, and Melanesian Spearhead Group.

    The French authorities had hoped that the process of reconciliation and economic rebalancing for the benefit of the Kanak community would have led to a consensual new political statute. But three referendums were not enough to decide the political future of the collectivity.

    After more than thirty years of political transition, these electoral results highlighted a crude reality: ethnicity decides the vote in New Caledonia. The Kanak population voted almost exclusively for independence, while the other communities comprising Europeans, Asians and Polynesians, mostly voted to remain in the French Republic. Two different visions of the future co-existed within the same territory.

    The Need for Mediation

    Going by the French Constitution, the transitory statute in New Caledonia ended the day after the third referendum.   New Caledonia remained under French sovereignty although the disgruntled Kanaks continue to contest the referendum’s results. As local elections are due to be held next year, there is a vital need to reach a local agreement between various political stakeholders to define a new political statute.

    A major stumbling block is the Kanak nationalists’ insistence, on the basis of a historical claim, on excluding from voting anyone who had settled in the territory after 1994. This category numbered nearly 34,000 people, or 17 per cent of the electorate. However, now that the transitory period is over, the discrimination towards these other French citizens will no longer be constitutional.

    Some scholars have suggested that questioning this historical right of the Kanaks would endanger the fragile peace. In other words, civil war is imminent once again. Emmanuel Macron’s mediation is therefore essential to nudge local political leaders to reconcile and to move towards a future common destiny.

    What this means for France’s Indo-Pacific Strategy

    In the French Indo-Pacific, French sovereignty is often questioned and sometimes contested from within the territories, and by foreign countries. These could undermine the national ambition in the region. New Caledonia is not the latest French collectivity posing problems for France’s Indo-Pacific strategy. There is an imminent independence conundrum in French Polynesia, another French collectivity in the Pacific, where an independent government, elected in April 2023 is being questioned. Macron’s government must actively mediate to reconcile differences in these troubled territories if its Indo-Pacific strategy is not to unravel.

    About the Author

    Dr Paco Milhiet holds a PhD in International Relations jointly conferred by the University of French Polynesia and the Catholic Institute of Paris. He is currently a Visiting Fellow at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / General / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global / East Asia and Asia Pacific
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    French President Emmanuel Macron’s visit to New Caledonia – a Pacific Ocean archipelago still under French sovereignty – was largely dedicated to local political issues. The results of the three referendums held between 2018 and 2021 to settle the political status of the territory have not been accepted by those in favour of independence. The growing political tensions in New Caledonia could have a negative impact on France’s Indo-Pacific strategy.

    COMMENTARY

    French President Emmanuel Macron visited New Caledonia from 24-26 July 2023 for the second time during his presidency as part of a trip that also took in Vanuatu (27 July) and Papua New Guinea (28 July). Five years earlier, in 2018, it was from New Caledonia that he implemented an Indo-Pacific strategy and clarified the role that the territory was to play regarding France’s new geopolitical ambition.

    Macron’s strategy for the French Indo-Pacific was to legitimise and enhance French assets in the region. The exercise of sovereignty in the overseas collectivities of the Indo-Pacific is a central component of the new narrative implemented by France. However, this geopolitical narrative is likely to be undermined by domestic political imperatives in New Caledonia.

    Indeed, this French territory of 18,600 sq km in Melanesia is a cornerstone of French strategy in the region. Strategically located in the Southwest Pacific astride a region facing growing US-China rivalry, it is the world’s fourth largest producer of nickel.

    New Caledonia lies 1,200 km east of Australia and 1,500 km north of New Zealand (see map from author’s personal drawing). Inhabited by Melanesian populations, mostly Kanaks, for more than 3,000 years, it was discovered by the British navigator James Cook in 1774 but proclaimed French in 1853, amid growing religious and political competition between European powers in the region.

    Unfinished Decolonisation Process

    Like Australia under the British, New Caledonia was first used by the French colonial power as a penitentiary settlement. With successive waves of immigration by European and Asian settlers (mostly Vietnamese and Indonesians) and the scourge of diseases, wars, and alcoholism, the Kanaks found themselves rapidly marginalised in their homeland.

    After living through discrimination and land spoliation under the colonial authority, the Kanak people gradually gained access to civil rights after the Second World War. However, they remained largely on the margins of economic development. The succession of independence in the Pacific region granted to the Samoa Islands (1962), Nauru (1968), Fiji and Tonga (1970), the Solomon Islands (1975), and Vanuatu (1980) led to cultural and nationalist claims by the Kanak people under the leadership of Jean-Marie Tjibaou.

    From 1984 to 1988, the political situation in New Caledonia deteriorated into a civil war, reaching a climax in 1988 when four French policemen were assassinated by independence activists, and 26 were taken hostage on the island of Ouvéa. An operation to free the hostages was carried out by the French army, causing the death of 19 pro-independence militants and two French soldiers.

    French Prime Minister Michel Rocard’s mediation resulted in the signing of the Matignon Agreements in June 1988, which established a 10-year transitional statute. The following year, Jean-Marie Tjibaou, the pro-independence leader who was a signatory to the Matignon Agreements, was assassinated by a Kanak extremist. In May 1998, the transitional statute was extended by another 20 years with the signing of the Nouméa Accord, which provided for an independence referendum in 2018 and an economic transfer to the Kanak communities.

    As for its international status, New Caledonia was recognised under UN Resolution 4141 as a non-self-governing territory, an explicit recognition of its unfinished decolonisation process.

    Three Referendums, Two Opposing Societies

    The year 2018 was crucial as the 30-year transitory period initiated during the Matignon Agreements in 1988 had come to an end. The population had to vote for its political future. The referendum question was simple: “Do you want New Caledonia to gain full sovereignty and become independent?”

    According to French constitutional law, if the answer was negative, further referendums could be organised every two years, up to a maximum of three such public votes. As it turned out, 56.67 per cent of the people voted against independence in 2018. In the second referendum in 2020, 53.26 per cent of the people again voted “No” to independence.

    As for the third referendum held on 12 December 2021, the main pro-independence parties had called for a boycott because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The result of the referendum – 96.50 per cent against independence – was therefore tainted by massive abstentions, with only 41.87 per cent of the electorate voting.

    Independence Referendums in New Caledonia:
    “Do you want New Caledonia to gain full sovereignty and become independent?”

    Yes No Participation
    1st referendum: 4/11/2018 43.33% 56.67% 81.01%
    2nd referendum: 4/10/2020 46.74% 53.26% 85.69%
    3rd referendum: 12/12/2021 3.50% 96.50% 41.87%

    The referendum process which was intended to lead to a consensual evolution of the statutes for or against independence now foreshadowed the beginning of a political confrontation. The pro-independence parties had already challenged the result of the third referendum and brought it before international organisations, including the UN, Pacific Islands Forum, and Melanesian Spearhead Group.

    The French authorities had hoped that the process of reconciliation and economic rebalancing for the benefit of the Kanak community would have led to a consensual new political statute. But three referendums were not enough to decide the political future of the collectivity.

    After more than thirty years of political transition, these electoral results highlighted a crude reality: ethnicity decides the vote in New Caledonia. The Kanak population voted almost exclusively for independence, while the other communities comprising Europeans, Asians and Polynesians, mostly voted to remain in the French Republic. Two different visions of the future co-existed within the same territory.

    The Need for Mediation

    Going by the French Constitution, the transitory statute in New Caledonia ended the day after the third referendum.   New Caledonia remained under French sovereignty although the disgruntled Kanaks continue to contest the referendum’s results. As local elections are due to be held next year, there is a vital need to reach a local agreement between various political stakeholders to define a new political statute.

    A major stumbling block is the Kanak nationalists’ insistence, on the basis of a historical claim, on excluding from voting anyone who had settled in the territory after 1994. This category numbered nearly 34,000 people, or 17 per cent of the electorate. However, now that the transitory period is over, the discrimination towards these other French citizens will no longer be constitutional.

    Some scholars have suggested that questioning this historical right of the Kanaks would endanger the fragile peace. In other words, civil war is imminent once again. Emmanuel Macron’s mediation is therefore essential to nudge local political leaders to reconcile and to move towards a future common destiny.

    What this means for France’s Indo-Pacific Strategy

    In the French Indo-Pacific, French sovereignty is often questioned and sometimes contested from within the territories, and by foreign countries. These could undermine the national ambition in the region. New Caledonia is not the latest French collectivity posing problems for France’s Indo-Pacific strategy. There is an imminent independence conundrum in French Polynesia, another French collectivity in the Pacific, where an independent government, elected in April 2023 is being questioned. Macron’s government must actively mediate to reconcile differences in these troubled territories if its Indo-Pacific strategy is not to unravel.

    About the Author

    Dr Paco Milhiet holds a PhD in International Relations jointly conferred by the University of French Polynesia and the Catholic Institute of Paris. He is currently a Visiting Fellow at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / General

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info