Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Region at a Crossroads: ASEAN Centrality Needs Traction
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO22071 | Region at a Crossroads: ASEAN Centrality Needs Traction
    Lawrence Anderson

    28 June 2022

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    US-China relations are at their most critical point since rapprochement 50 years ago. It leaves ASEAN states vulnerable to significant pressure from both superpowers to choose sides. If ASEAN can stand firm, it is best placed to take on the challenging task of encouraging China and the US to build trust and manage their differences peacefully.

    200818 CO20158 ASEAN as Pivotal Actor Balancing Centrality and the Indo Pacific FB 768x549 1
    Source: Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    US-CHINA relations are at their most critical point since rapprochement 50 years ago. Over the last several weeks, US and Chinese defence and foreign policy officials separately engaged in a flurry of diplomatic activity with their Asian and South Pacific counterparts.

    The aim: to win friends and allies to their respective strategic narratives. Despite the ongoing war in Ukraine, Sino-US competition remains the key concern in the Asia-Pacific/Indo-Pacific. The recently concluded Shangri-la Dialogue (SLD) in Singapore has reinforced this perception.

    US-China Collision Course: ASEAN Dilemmas

    As US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin and Chinese Defence Minister Wei Fenghe laid out their respective national positions on Taiwan, the East China Sea, South China Sea, North Korea, and the war in Ukraine, it left some analysts to conclude that America and China continue to be on a collision course that could end in open hostilities.

    On an optimistic note, however, the SLD enabled both men to meet face-to-face for the first time and despite policy differences, they agreed to continue their dialogue at future meetings. Underpinning their strong words in public, the two delegations know they cannot overreach. Both outcomes have presented ASEAN with dilemmas.

    Firstly, all ASEAN countries want substantive ties and active cooperation with both Beijing and Washington and not have to choose sides. Secondly, while the US and China have reiterated that they have no intention of forcing ASEAN countries to choose sides, the reality is starkly different.

    Thirdly, the US and China stress that they continue to strongly support ASEAN Centrality, but their respective actions so far bring no meaningful impact on that mantra, and ASEAN does not come across as a cohesive grouping serving Southeast Asia’s neutrality and role as an honest broker in big-power rivalry.

    Need for Mindset Change

    Yet, ASEAN is best placed to take on the challenging task of building on what the SLD has shown to be the way forward to encourage China and the US as well as their friends and allies in the region to engage in substantive dialogue to build trust and manage their differences peacefully.

    As Professor Tommy Koh of Singapore eloquently put it: ASEAN’s fondest wish is for America and China to stop quarrelling and learn to work together for the stability and prosperity of the region. Going forward, this requires a mindset change of all parties.

    A strong, united, and even-handed ASEAN is of better value to both China and the US. There are so many transboundary issues of the 21ˢᵗ century which the two superpowers can utilise ASEAN to bridge and connect, and to enable productive co-existence and developmental progress.

    Climate change is a reality which needs more cooperation and joint action. New communicable diseases, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, threaten public health globally in an unprecedented manner.

    Digitalisation of international trade and investment flows requires new standards of management. The urgency to re-learn how best to work strategically on the common challenges facing humanity is more compelling with each passing day.

    ASEAN Centrality Needs Traction

    Therefore, considerable effort must be exerted by ASEAN leaders collectively to give traction to the centrality of ASEAN as a foundation for the ASEAN Community and its ability to strengthen regional peace and to increase prosperity for the people of the region.

    By most reliable estimates, ASEAN will be in the top quartet of the world’s economies by 2030, a short eight years away. This means a significant clout in the global economy. ASEAN can play an important role in preserving stability and security. It is necessary to quickly move beyond the rhetoric of a strong, united, and successful ASEAN.

    Firstly, ASEAN countries need to decide what they are prepared to do together, as well as what they are not prepared to do with the big powers. Then, communicate this clearly to their Dialogue Partners (which include all the big powers).

    It need not entail forging an ASEAN consensus on all issues. But it does mean agreeing on areas where ASEAN member states must stand firmly together despite intense outside pressure to do things unilaterally.

    In the past, ASEAN was able to achieve significant outcomes by taking positions based on the collective good of all its members and resisting the urge to resort always to positions based solely on the respective national interests.

    To be a credible and respected organisation, ASEAN must agree to uphold the principles enshrined in the UN Charter, ASEAN Charter and the ASEAN Treaty of Amity and Cooperation — signed by more than 40 countries so far, including the US, China and Russia.

    ASEAN should work closely with its Dialogue Partners to abide by principles that support the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states; the freedom to make decisions as independent countries; not using force to settle differences; and respect for non-interference in the internal affairs of all nations.

    Region at a Crossroads: Send Clear Message to Big Powers

    Secondly, ASEAN must send the clear message to all big powers that ASEAN member states want them to stay engaged in the region, but in positive ways that benefit all. For ASEAN’s Dialogue Partners, the message should be to continue bilateral assistance to individual member states, but also contribute substantially to region-wide initiatives.

    Key ones include completing the proposed Code of Conduct in the South China Sea; cooperation to address problems afflicting the Mekong sub-region; combatting pandemics; and environmental protection.

    Thirdly, ASEAN has the relevant regional security mechanisms and platforms to enable their leaders and senior officials to meet collectively with their counterparts from and beyond the region to share candid views on relevant issues and challenges.

    Specifically, the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), ASEAN Defence Ministers Meeting (ADMM)-Plus, and East Asia Summit (EAS) have been useful to leaders and policy makers in offering different perspectives and various forms of inclusive engagements.

    They also serve to build trust and enable participants to engage in substantial and robust discussions rather than scripted speeches per se. Continuing to do this regularly and purposefully will reinvigorate the ARF, ADMM-Plus and EAS significantly.

    The countries of the Asia-Pacific/Indo-Pacific stand at a crossroads. It will take a concerted effort by all parties if the region is to continue its trajectory to peace, progress, and prosperity. ASEAN and its like-minded partners should work closely to persuade all parties to focus on strengthening and using ASEAN for an enduring peace and security for all.

    About the Author

    Lawrence Anderson is Senior Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He is Singapore’s Representative to the Advisory Board of the ASEAN Institute for Peace and Reconciliation (ASEAN-IPR). He was formerly Singapore’s Ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Bahrain.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Conflict and Stability / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / Singapore and Homeland Security / Central Asia / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    US-China relations are at their most critical point since rapprochement 50 years ago. It leaves ASEAN states vulnerable to significant pressure from both superpowers to choose sides. If ASEAN can stand firm, it is best placed to take on the challenging task of encouraging China and the US to build trust and manage their differences peacefully.

    200818 CO20158 ASEAN as Pivotal Actor Balancing Centrality and the Indo Pacific FB 768x549 1
    Source: Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    US-CHINA relations are at their most critical point since rapprochement 50 years ago. Over the last several weeks, US and Chinese defence and foreign policy officials separately engaged in a flurry of diplomatic activity with their Asian and South Pacific counterparts.

    The aim: to win friends and allies to their respective strategic narratives. Despite the ongoing war in Ukraine, Sino-US competition remains the key concern in the Asia-Pacific/Indo-Pacific. The recently concluded Shangri-la Dialogue (SLD) in Singapore has reinforced this perception.

    US-China Collision Course: ASEAN Dilemmas

    As US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin and Chinese Defence Minister Wei Fenghe laid out their respective national positions on Taiwan, the East China Sea, South China Sea, North Korea, and the war in Ukraine, it left some analysts to conclude that America and China continue to be on a collision course that could end in open hostilities.

    On an optimistic note, however, the SLD enabled both men to meet face-to-face for the first time and despite policy differences, they agreed to continue their dialogue at future meetings. Underpinning their strong words in public, the two delegations know they cannot overreach. Both outcomes have presented ASEAN with dilemmas.

    Firstly, all ASEAN countries want substantive ties and active cooperation with both Beijing and Washington and not have to choose sides. Secondly, while the US and China have reiterated that they have no intention of forcing ASEAN countries to choose sides, the reality is starkly different.

    Thirdly, the US and China stress that they continue to strongly support ASEAN Centrality, but their respective actions so far bring no meaningful impact on that mantra, and ASEAN does not come across as a cohesive grouping serving Southeast Asia’s neutrality and role as an honest broker in big-power rivalry.

    Need for Mindset Change

    Yet, ASEAN is best placed to take on the challenging task of building on what the SLD has shown to be the way forward to encourage China and the US as well as their friends and allies in the region to engage in substantive dialogue to build trust and manage their differences peacefully.

    As Professor Tommy Koh of Singapore eloquently put it: ASEAN’s fondest wish is for America and China to stop quarrelling and learn to work together for the stability and prosperity of the region. Going forward, this requires a mindset change of all parties.

    A strong, united, and even-handed ASEAN is of better value to both China and the US. There are so many transboundary issues of the 21ˢᵗ century which the two superpowers can utilise ASEAN to bridge and connect, and to enable productive co-existence and developmental progress.

    Climate change is a reality which needs more cooperation and joint action. New communicable diseases, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, threaten public health globally in an unprecedented manner.

    Digitalisation of international trade and investment flows requires new standards of management. The urgency to re-learn how best to work strategically on the common challenges facing humanity is more compelling with each passing day.

    ASEAN Centrality Needs Traction

    Therefore, considerable effort must be exerted by ASEAN leaders collectively to give traction to the centrality of ASEAN as a foundation for the ASEAN Community and its ability to strengthen regional peace and to increase prosperity for the people of the region.

    By most reliable estimates, ASEAN will be in the top quartet of the world’s economies by 2030, a short eight years away. This means a significant clout in the global economy. ASEAN can play an important role in preserving stability and security. It is necessary to quickly move beyond the rhetoric of a strong, united, and successful ASEAN.

    Firstly, ASEAN countries need to decide what they are prepared to do together, as well as what they are not prepared to do with the big powers. Then, communicate this clearly to their Dialogue Partners (which include all the big powers).

    It need not entail forging an ASEAN consensus on all issues. But it does mean agreeing on areas where ASEAN member states must stand firmly together despite intense outside pressure to do things unilaterally.

    In the past, ASEAN was able to achieve significant outcomes by taking positions based on the collective good of all its members and resisting the urge to resort always to positions based solely on the respective national interests.

    To be a credible and respected organisation, ASEAN must agree to uphold the principles enshrined in the UN Charter, ASEAN Charter and the ASEAN Treaty of Amity and Cooperation — signed by more than 40 countries so far, including the US, China and Russia.

    ASEAN should work closely with its Dialogue Partners to abide by principles that support the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states; the freedom to make decisions as independent countries; not using force to settle differences; and respect for non-interference in the internal affairs of all nations.

    Region at a Crossroads: Send Clear Message to Big Powers

    Secondly, ASEAN must send the clear message to all big powers that ASEAN member states want them to stay engaged in the region, but in positive ways that benefit all. For ASEAN’s Dialogue Partners, the message should be to continue bilateral assistance to individual member states, but also contribute substantially to region-wide initiatives.

    Key ones include completing the proposed Code of Conduct in the South China Sea; cooperation to address problems afflicting the Mekong sub-region; combatting pandemics; and environmental protection.

    Thirdly, ASEAN has the relevant regional security mechanisms and platforms to enable their leaders and senior officials to meet collectively with their counterparts from and beyond the region to share candid views on relevant issues and challenges.

    Specifically, the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), ASEAN Defence Ministers Meeting (ADMM)-Plus, and East Asia Summit (EAS) have been useful to leaders and policy makers in offering different perspectives and various forms of inclusive engagements.

    They also serve to build trust and enable participants to engage in substantial and robust discussions rather than scripted speeches per se. Continuing to do this regularly and purposefully will reinvigorate the ARF, ADMM-Plus and EAS significantly.

    The countries of the Asia-Pacific/Indo-Pacific stand at a crossroads. It will take a concerted effort by all parties if the region is to continue its trajectory to peace, progress, and prosperity. ASEAN and its like-minded partners should work closely to persuade all parties to focus on strengthening and using ASEAN for an enduring peace and security for all.

    About the Author

    Lawrence Anderson is Senior Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He is Singapore’s Representative to the Advisory Board of the ASEAN Institute for Peace and Reconciliation (ASEAN-IPR). He was formerly Singapore’s Ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Bahrain.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Conflict and Stability / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / Singapore and Homeland Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info