Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Shangri-La Dialogue 2025: Asian Security Going Forward
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO25122 | Shangri-La Dialogue 2025: Asian Security Going Forward
    Alan Chong

    04 June 2025

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    The Shangri-La Dialogue 2025 has galvanised Asia’s security through far-reaching questions that were first aired at the end of World War. The idea of “Peace Through Strength” was enunciated by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. This was balanced by discussions on the importance of international law, communicating efficaciously, and building trust.

    Source: Wikimedia Commons
    Source: Wikimedia Commons

    COMMENTARY

    The recent Shangri-La Dialogue embodied both the familiar – principally the US-China rivalry – and the less familiar security terrain. The presence of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at last year’s conference was an effort to persuade Asian states not to be indifferent to the violation of a state’s sovereignty by another.

    This year, European security again held centre stage with French President Emmanuel Macron’s keynote speech proclaiming that “the time for non-alignment has undoubtedly passed” as he called for “coalitions of action” that would act in concert to build a constructive world order. Macron envisioned Asia and Europe working in win-win relationships while maintaining the rule of law.

    “Peace Through Strength”

    Using provocative and often hostile language reminiscent of the interwar years, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warned that China’s threat to Indo-Pacific security was “imminent”. Making the assumption that China’s actions were predatory towards the military status quo, he asserted that peace could only be guaranteed in the face of a rising military superpower like China by increasing national defence budgets across Asia.

    He urged Asia to learn from the European wakening towards their military responsibilities, pointing out that “NATO members are pledging to spend 5 per cent of their GDP on defence, even Germany. So it doesn’t make sense for countries in Europe to do that while key allies in Asia spend less on defence in the face of an even more formidable threat, not to mention North Korea”.

    For a long time, Asian defence officials have been ambivalent in their words and deeds about increasing their alignment with minilateral defence initiatives such as the Quad and AUKUS. To be confronted with the call to follow NATO and European defence spending compels the Asian delegations at the Shangri-La Dialogue to ponder over similar security dilemmas in regional hotspots.

    Toning down his belligerence, Hegseth acknowledged China as a historic civilisation and a great nation that the US wanted to cooperate with: “We respect you, your traditions and your militaries. And we want to work with you where our shared interests align”. However, the Chinese were not mollified. Their representatives were incensed by Hegseth’s remarks referencing the Donald Trump Administration’s declaration of not allowing China to invade Taiwan and provocative remarks labelling China as a threat to the Indo-Pacific. A Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson warned: “The US must never play with fire on [the Taiwan] question”.

    Playing separately to Hegseth’s “peace through strength” proposition, General Anil Chauhan, India’s Chief of Defence Staff, engaged in a war of words with his Pakistani counterpart by warning of “red lines of tolerance” for more than two decades of Pakistan’s alleged sponsorship of terrorists attacking India. Speaking on behalf of Islamabad, General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, Pakistan’s Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, warned his Indian counterpart and the audience present that the next military exchange between the two South Asian nuclear powers could easily escalate into city bombing campaigns and result in spiralling numbers of civilian casualties.

    Striking a very different note, Malaysia’s Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, said that peace in Southeast Asia was maintained “through cooperation, collective resilience and the steady exercise of our own agency”. He referred to ASEAN’s management of security through habits of good neighbourliness and sympathetic patience for Asian states facing challenges, which with good national governance contributed to the net effect of regional peace. Drawing attention to the effect of US-initiated tariffs, he warned of “the dangers of unilateral actions, retaliatory tariffs and the growing risk of global fragmentation”. Anwar’s views offered a contrasting vision to Hegseth’s heavily militarised understanding of security.

    The Rule of Law

    European Commission Vice-President and High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas spoke of the momentous significance of the Shangri-La Dialogue 80 years after the end of World War II. This was “when autocratic powers tried to bend the global order to their will and lost”. The end of World War II provided the global community with an opportunity to build the United Nations as the foundation for an international system based on law.

    In language reminiscent of the 1945 San Francisco conference establishing the UN, she said, “We developed legal principles to try crimes of atrocity. We established international law to protect territorial integrity. We signed the United Nations Charter. This is a treaty that binds every UN Member State by law”. On this basis, she reminded Asian audiences that Russia violated these precepts by first occupying Crimea in 2014 and then launching a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

    Kallas spoke against North Korea’s contribution of troops and materiel to Russia’s war effort as a flagrant violation of international law. She called out China for supplying dual-use technologies to Moscow. She also alleged that China violated the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea by deploying cable-cutting ships to disrupt undersea internet cables in the Baltic Sea. Arguing that Europe and Asia shared a common interest in defending the economic and territorial integrity of undersea telecommunications, Kallas added, “And with threats to our critical underwater infrastructure, our security is literally interlinked”. The safety of Asia’s commerce and communications with the rest of the world was now bound up with the international legal regimes governing land borders, the seas and trade.

    Talk and Trust in a Dangerous World

    As the host country, Singapore’s defence minister Chan Chun Sing had the unenviable task of concluding the Shangri-La Dialogue. He argued that Singapore stood on the side of principles, instead of taking sides with any great power. Upholding the UN spirit prevalent in 1945 at the end of the most violent war in history, he reminded the audience that small states cannot be content in a world order where the strong do what they will and the weak suffer what they must.

    Noting the absence of the Chinese defence minister and serving to bridge the differences between China and the US, Chan urged all Asian states to continue reaching out to Beijing as much as he believed Beijing will likewise wish to build channels of confidence to them. Chan also commended Defence Secretary Hegseth for his frankness and for the US commitment to stay engaged in the Indo-Pacific.

    Above all, Chan argued that Singapore’s hosting of the annual Dialogue was a meaningful contribution to frank and inclusive communication by relevant powers and Asian states about a global security order that traverses all frontiers. Chan added, “So we are not just passing messages, if you like. We have our own perspectives, garnered from our interactions with our friends and partners. And we share them frankly with different partners”.

    Spotlighting Asian security and seeking to recast its relevance and role in the international system in the midst of the intensifying US-China rivalry is a tall order but must be undertaken nevertheless. Talking to each other and building trust among nation states must continue in order to secure peace and progress for all.

    About the Author

    Dr Alan Chong is a Senior Fellow in the Centre for Multilateralism Studies at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Europe / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    The Shangri-La Dialogue 2025 has galvanised Asia’s security through far-reaching questions that were first aired at the end of World War. The idea of “Peace Through Strength” was enunciated by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. This was balanced by discussions on the importance of international law, communicating efficaciously, and building trust.

    Source: Wikimedia Commons
    Source: Wikimedia Commons

    COMMENTARY

    The recent Shangri-La Dialogue embodied both the familiar – principally the US-China rivalry – and the less familiar security terrain. The presence of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at last year’s conference was an effort to persuade Asian states not to be indifferent to the violation of a state’s sovereignty by another.

    This year, European security again held centre stage with French President Emmanuel Macron’s keynote speech proclaiming that “the time for non-alignment has undoubtedly passed” as he called for “coalitions of action” that would act in concert to build a constructive world order. Macron envisioned Asia and Europe working in win-win relationships while maintaining the rule of law.

    “Peace Through Strength”

    Using provocative and often hostile language reminiscent of the interwar years, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warned that China’s threat to Indo-Pacific security was “imminent”. Making the assumption that China’s actions were predatory towards the military status quo, he asserted that peace could only be guaranteed in the face of a rising military superpower like China by increasing national defence budgets across Asia.

    He urged Asia to learn from the European wakening towards their military responsibilities, pointing out that “NATO members are pledging to spend 5 per cent of their GDP on defence, even Germany. So it doesn’t make sense for countries in Europe to do that while key allies in Asia spend less on defence in the face of an even more formidable threat, not to mention North Korea”.

    For a long time, Asian defence officials have been ambivalent in their words and deeds about increasing their alignment with minilateral defence initiatives such as the Quad and AUKUS. To be confronted with the call to follow NATO and European defence spending compels the Asian delegations at the Shangri-La Dialogue to ponder over similar security dilemmas in regional hotspots.

    Toning down his belligerence, Hegseth acknowledged China as a historic civilisation and a great nation that the US wanted to cooperate with: “We respect you, your traditions and your militaries. And we want to work with you where our shared interests align”. However, the Chinese were not mollified. Their representatives were incensed by Hegseth’s remarks referencing the Donald Trump Administration’s declaration of not allowing China to invade Taiwan and provocative remarks labelling China as a threat to the Indo-Pacific. A Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson warned: “The US must never play with fire on [the Taiwan] question”.

    Playing separately to Hegseth’s “peace through strength” proposition, General Anil Chauhan, India’s Chief of Defence Staff, engaged in a war of words with his Pakistani counterpart by warning of “red lines of tolerance” for more than two decades of Pakistan’s alleged sponsorship of terrorists attacking India. Speaking on behalf of Islamabad, General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, Pakistan’s Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, warned his Indian counterpart and the audience present that the next military exchange between the two South Asian nuclear powers could easily escalate into city bombing campaigns and result in spiralling numbers of civilian casualties.

    Striking a very different note, Malaysia’s Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, said that peace in Southeast Asia was maintained “through cooperation, collective resilience and the steady exercise of our own agency”. He referred to ASEAN’s management of security through habits of good neighbourliness and sympathetic patience for Asian states facing challenges, which with good national governance contributed to the net effect of regional peace. Drawing attention to the effect of US-initiated tariffs, he warned of “the dangers of unilateral actions, retaliatory tariffs and the growing risk of global fragmentation”. Anwar’s views offered a contrasting vision to Hegseth’s heavily militarised understanding of security.

    The Rule of Law

    European Commission Vice-President and High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas spoke of the momentous significance of the Shangri-La Dialogue 80 years after the end of World War II. This was “when autocratic powers tried to bend the global order to their will and lost”. The end of World War II provided the global community with an opportunity to build the United Nations as the foundation for an international system based on law.

    In language reminiscent of the 1945 San Francisco conference establishing the UN, she said, “We developed legal principles to try crimes of atrocity. We established international law to protect territorial integrity. We signed the United Nations Charter. This is a treaty that binds every UN Member State by law”. On this basis, she reminded Asian audiences that Russia violated these precepts by first occupying Crimea in 2014 and then launching a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

    Kallas spoke against North Korea’s contribution of troops and materiel to Russia’s war effort as a flagrant violation of international law. She called out China for supplying dual-use technologies to Moscow. She also alleged that China violated the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea by deploying cable-cutting ships to disrupt undersea internet cables in the Baltic Sea. Arguing that Europe and Asia shared a common interest in defending the economic and territorial integrity of undersea telecommunications, Kallas added, “And with threats to our critical underwater infrastructure, our security is literally interlinked”. The safety of Asia’s commerce and communications with the rest of the world was now bound up with the international legal regimes governing land borders, the seas and trade.

    Talk and Trust in a Dangerous World

    As the host country, Singapore’s defence minister Chan Chun Sing had the unenviable task of concluding the Shangri-La Dialogue. He argued that Singapore stood on the side of principles, instead of taking sides with any great power. Upholding the UN spirit prevalent in 1945 at the end of the most violent war in history, he reminded the audience that small states cannot be content in a world order where the strong do what they will and the weak suffer what they must.

    Noting the absence of the Chinese defence minister and serving to bridge the differences between China and the US, Chan urged all Asian states to continue reaching out to Beijing as much as he believed Beijing will likewise wish to build channels of confidence to them. Chan also commended Defence Secretary Hegseth for his frankness and for the US commitment to stay engaged in the Indo-Pacific.

    Above all, Chan argued that Singapore’s hosting of the annual Dialogue was a meaningful contribution to frank and inclusive communication by relevant powers and Asian states about a global security order that traverses all frontiers. Chan added, “So we are not just passing messages, if you like. We have our own perspectives, garnered from our interactions with our friends and partners. And we share them frankly with different partners”.

    Spotlighting Asian security and seeking to recast its relevance and role in the international system in the midst of the intensifying US-China rivalry is a tall order but must be undertaken nevertheless. Talking to each other and building trust among nation states must continue in order to secure peace and progress for all.

    About the Author

    Dr Alan Chong is a Senior Fellow in the Centre for Multilateralism Studies at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info