Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Singapore’s Protection of Minorities: Religious Freedom and State Management
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO24051 | Singapore’s Protection of Minorities: Religious Freedom and State Management
    Paul Hedges

    17 April 2024

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    At a time of heightened Islamophobia and antisemitism in many parts of the world resulting from the Israeli-Hamas war, Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K. Shanmugam, recently stated Singapore’s determination to protect all minorities, especially the Jewish and Muslim communities. This stance is hardly surprising considering Singapore’s no-nonsense and unashamedly tough approach to managing racial and religious harmony among the diverse communities.

    240419 CO24051 Singapores Protection of Minorities Religious Freedom and State Management
    Source: Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    The current Israeli-Hamas war in Gaza has heightened both Islamophobia and antisemitism in many parts of the globe. Hamas’ 7 October terror attack drew broad public sympathy for Israel, but the extremity of the Netanyahu government’s response, which has drawn fears of genocide and war crimes over the unprecedented number of civilian deaths and casualties, has seen global public sympathy move firmly behind the Palestinian people.

    Regrettably, but predictably, this sympathy for one party has often turned to hatred for the other party, which within the wide frame of both Islamophobic and antisemitic prejudice has sometimes meant violence against innocent and uninvolved Jews and Muslims in other parts of the world.

    In this context, Minister Shanmugam’s recent words, at a Passover celebration with the Jewish and interfaith community present, are important to reiterate Singapore’s resistance to these global trends.

    Prejudice

    It has been said before but bears reiteration, that prejudice occurs when somebody, or a group of people, identified as belonging to a particular group is targeted with hatred, discrimination, or violence because of their association with that group. Such prejudice hurts all of us.

    One example is the Islamophobic mindset that acts of terror committed in the name of Islam must mean that all Muslims are potential terrorists, who should therefore be treated with suspicion, assuming the good-Muslim-bad-Muslim trope, and its corollary that unless a Muslim denounces every act of terror, they must support it; a test not attributed to Buddhists, Christians, or Hindus, for instance, when people commit acts of terror in the name of these religions.

    On the Jewish side, a form of antisemitism that is often termed anti-Zionism attributes to all Jews guilt for the activities of the Israeli government. Or some may ask Jews to denounce the right of Israel to exist, to be anti-Zionist, to show that they do not support the actions of a particular government or militant Zionist settlers. To them, even assuming a moderate Zionism, or voicing the Jewish people’s right to a state, means support for the most extreme interpretations of Zionism.

    Freedom to Manifest Religion

    Freedom of religion and belief, as generally glossed, is a fundamental right under the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights (Article 18). This means that people have the right to believe in their religion, or lack thereof, and to manifest that belief in practice. The latter is only limited for good reasons of public safety and morality.

    One aspect of this is the need for not just legal rights and protections, but their legislative and social implementation. This entails the question of whether it is safe for Jews and Muslims, amongst others, to practice and exercise their religion and to go about their lives bearing the markers of their faith within the law.

    At the launch of my book, Religious Hatred: Prejudice, Islamophobia and Antisemitism in Global Context, on 4 April 2021, Singapore’s Chief Rabbi, Mordechai Abergel, stated that in his nineteen years in Singapore, he had safely walked its streets without one antisemitic incident, a far cry from what he had known growing up in Belgium.

    Coming from the UK, I was shocked or surprised, in a good way, that Muslims in Singapore could find informal places for their prayers in such places as stairwells or in corners of car parks. There, they could safely leave their prayer mats and come back to them as needed. This would be unthinkable in many Western contexts.

    Of course, Singapore is no paradise, and in recent years its security services have caught mainly lone wolf actors intent to attack Jews and Muslims in their places of worship. Occasional incidents of prejudice do occur in the streets, and undoubtedly some ill will is harboured in people’s hearts or is spoken when people feel they can do so in select gatherings.

    Both antisemitism and Islamophobia exist in the region and in Singapore. Compared to its regional neighbours, or many Western countries, the lived coexistence of Singapore, and the seeming tolerance and harmony fostered among its people is nonetheless remarkable.

    Singapore’s Hand: Heavy or Protecting?

    In many speeches, both Minister Shanmugam and other Singapore political office holders have reiterated time and again that the harmony in the city state is not natural but is the result of hard and intentional work. Aware of its precarity as a small state, Singapore knows that what may be a seemingly minor and localised incident in another country could envelop that whole nation if not well managed.

    Singapore’s approach is certainly top-down, and it has been accused of heavy-handed, if not authoritarian, management, even if soft authoritarianism is felt by some to be more apt. The frequent reiteration of the dangers, if touchy issues revolving around faith and traditions of the respective communities go unmanaged, has led to Singapore’s being characterised as marked by “precarious toleration”, in that it has toleration, but one accompanied by constant government warnings that all will go astray if not properly managed.

    Ironically, Singapore often ranks lowly in global league tables on freedom of religion. One narrative is that heavy-handed management, backed by potentially draconian legislative tools, means that Singaporeans stay in line because they fear the consequences.

    Yet such a picture would be partial at best. While managed, surveys have shown that living side-by-side in public housing blocks, most Singaporeans are accepting and tolerant of the racial and religious diversity around them. My daughter, in a local school, has described her friendship group as a mini-United Nations given its diverse religio-racial nature, something which is entirely natural and normal in the local context.

    Also, as we have noted, people can genuinely feel safe in Singapore to practice and manifest their religion, including Jews and Muslims. This is remarkable not just in the region, but also globally. As the Muslim honorary secretary of the Interreligious Organisation of Singapore (IRO), Mr Ameerali Abdeali put it to The Straits Times: “Whatever is happening in other parts of the world, we in Singapore have, over the decades, built our friendship… and we want to remain together and to help and protect each other”.

    This sentiment, widely shared among the different communities, is partly at least due to the government’s active promotion of platforms like the Racial and Religious Harmony Circles for grassroots coexistence and events like the International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS) organised by the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS). They have brought people together for learning in ways that may be considered managed but arguably do genuine work for dialogue and cohesion.

    It is a truism that our research methods or questions will, to some degree at least, influence our research findings. As such, depending upon the emphasis, Singapore’s approach may be overbearing or truly valued for the safety it affords.

    Whatever the case, it is clear that Singapore takes this safety seriously as a matter of its existential survival besides the protection it affords those here. As Minister Shanmugam put it: “There is a reason why a Cabinet minister is here, speaking with you – to send a message to everyone that every community in Singapore is equal and will be protected”.

    About the Author

    Paul Hedges, PhD, is Associate Professor of Interreligious Studies in the Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies Programme, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. His most recent books are Understanding Religion: Theories and Methods for Studying Religiously Diverse Societies (California, 2021), and Religious Hatred: Prejudice, Islamophobia, and Antisemitism in Global Context (Bloomsbury, 2021). He also has a forthcoming book Christian Polytheism? (Routledge 2024).

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Religion in Contemporary Society / Singapore and Homeland Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    At a time of heightened Islamophobia and antisemitism in many parts of the world resulting from the Israeli-Hamas war, Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K. Shanmugam, recently stated Singapore’s determination to protect all minorities, especially the Jewish and Muslim communities. This stance is hardly surprising considering Singapore’s no-nonsense and unashamedly tough approach to managing racial and religious harmony among the diverse communities.

    240419 CO24051 Singapores Protection of Minorities Religious Freedom and State Management
    Source: Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    The current Israeli-Hamas war in Gaza has heightened both Islamophobia and antisemitism in many parts of the globe. Hamas’ 7 October terror attack drew broad public sympathy for Israel, but the extremity of the Netanyahu government’s response, which has drawn fears of genocide and war crimes over the unprecedented number of civilian deaths and casualties, has seen global public sympathy move firmly behind the Palestinian people.

    Regrettably, but predictably, this sympathy for one party has often turned to hatred for the other party, which within the wide frame of both Islamophobic and antisemitic prejudice has sometimes meant violence against innocent and uninvolved Jews and Muslims in other parts of the world.

    In this context, Minister Shanmugam’s recent words, at a Passover celebration with the Jewish and interfaith community present, are important to reiterate Singapore’s resistance to these global trends.

    Prejudice

    It has been said before but bears reiteration, that prejudice occurs when somebody, or a group of people, identified as belonging to a particular group is targeted with hatred, discrimination, or violence because of their association with that group. Such prejudice hurts all of us.

    One example is the Islamophobic mindset that acts of terror committed in the name of Islam must mean that all Muslims are potential terrorists, who should therefore be treated with suspicion, assuming the good-Muslim-bad-Muslim trope, and its corollary that unless a Muslim denounces every act of terror, they must support it; a test not attributed to Buddhists, Christians, or Hindus, for instance, when people commit acts of terror in the name of these religions.

    On the Jewish side, a form of antisemitism that is often termed anti-Zionism attributes to all Jews guilt for the activities of the Israeli government. Or some may ask Jews to denounce the right of Israel to exist, to be anti-Zionist, to show that they do not support the actions of a particular government or militant Zionist settlers. To them, even assuming a moderate Zionism, or voicing the Jewish people’s right to a state, means support for the most extreme interpretations of Zionism.

    Freedom to Manifest Religion

    Freedom of religion and belief, as generally glossed, is a fundamental right under the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights (Article 18). This means that people have the right to believe in their religion, or lack thereof, and to manifest that belief in practice. The latter is only limited for good reasons of public safety and morality.

    One aspect of this is the need for not just legal rights and protections, but their legislative and social implementation. This entails the question of whether it is safe for Jews and Muslims, amongst others, to practice and exercise their religion and to go about their lives bearing the markers of their faith within the law.

    At the launch of my book, Religious Hatred: Prejudice, Islamophobia and Antisemitism in Global Context, on 4 April 2021, Singapore’s Chief Rabbi, Mordechai Abergel, stated that in his nineteen years in Singapore, he had safely walked its streets without one antisemitic incident, a far cry from what he had known growing up in Belgium.

    Coming from the UK, I was shocked or surprised, in a good way, that Muslims in Singapore could find informal places for their prayers in such places as stairwells or in corners of car parks. There, they could safely leave their prayer mats and come back to them as needed. This would be unthinkable in many Western contexts.

    Of course, Singapore is no paradise, and in recent years its security services have caught mainly lone wolf actors intent to attack Jews and Muslims in their places of worship. Occasional incidents of prejudice do occur in the streets, and undoubtedly some ill will is harboured in people’s hearts or is spoken when people feel they can do so in select gatherings.

    Both antisemitism and Islamophobia exist in the region and in Singapore. Compared to its regional neighbours, or many Western countries, the lived coexistence of Singapore, and the seeming tolerance and harmony fostered among its people is nonetheless remarkable.

    Singapore’s Hand: Heavy or Protecting?

    In many speeches, both Minister Shanmugam and other Singapore political office holders have reiterated time and again that the harmony in the city state is not natural but is the result of hard and intentional work. Aware of its precarity as a small state, Singapore knows that what may be a seemingly minor and localised incident in another country could envelop that whole nation if not well managed.

    Singapore’s approach is certainly top-down, and it has been accused of heavy-handed, if not authoritarian, management, even if soft authoritarianism is felt by some to be more apt. The frequent reiteration of the dangers, if touchy issues revolving around faith and traditions of the respective communities go unmanaged, has led to Singapore’s being characterised as marked by “precarious toleration”, in that it has toleration, but one accompanied by constant government warnings that all will go astray if not properly managed.

    Ironically, Singapore often ranks lowly in global league tables on freedom of religion. One narrative is that heavy-handed management, backed by potentially draconian legislative tools, means that Singaporeans stay in line because they fear the consequences.

    Yet such a picture would be partial at best. While managed, surveys have shown that living side-by-side in public housing blocks, most Singaporeans are accepting and tolerant of the racial and religious diversity around them. My daughter, in a local school, has described her friendship group as a mini-United Nations given its diverse religio-racial nature, something which is entirely natural and normal in the local context.

    Also, as we have noted, people can genuinely feel safe in Singapore to practice and manifest their religion, including Jews and Muslims. This is remarkable not just in the region, but also globally. As the Muslim honorary secretary of the Interreligious Organisation of Singapore (IRO), Mr Ameerali Abdeali put it to The Straits Times: “Whatever is happening in other parts of the world, we in Singapore have, over the decades, built our friendship… and we want to remain together and to help and protect each other”.

    This sentiment, widely shared among the different communities, is partly at least due to the government’s active promotion of platforms like the Racial and Religious Harmony Circles for grassroots coexistence and events like the International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS) organised by the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS). They have brought people together for learning in ways that may be considered managed but arguably do genuine work for dialogue and cohesion.

    It is a truism that our research methods or questions will, to some degree at least, influence our research findings. As such, depending upon the emphasis, Singapore’s approach may be overbearing or truly valued for the safety it affords.

    Whatever the case, it is clear that Singapore takes this safety seriously as a matter of its existential survival besides the protection it affords those here. As Minister Shanmugam put it: “There is a reason why a Cabinet minister is here, speaking with you – to send a message to everyone that every community in Singapore is equal and will be protected”.

    About the Author

    Paul Hedges, PhD, is Associate Professor of Interreligious Studies in the Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies Programme, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. His most recent books are Understanding Religion: Theories and Methods for Studying Religiously Diverse Societies (California, 2021), and Religious Hatred: Prejudice, Islamophobia, and Antisemitism in Global Context (Bloomsbury, 2021). He also has a forthcoming book Christian Polytheism? (Routledge 2024).

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Religion in Contemporary Society / Singapore and Homeland Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info