Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      News ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio Channel
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS
Connect
Search
  • RSIS
  • Publication
  • RSIS Publications
  • South Asia’s Trade Policy: Adopt East Asian Approach
  • Annual Reviews
  • Books
  • Bulletins and Newsletters
  • RSIS Commentary Series
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
  • Commemorative / Event Reports
  • Future Issues
  • IDSS Papers
  • Interreligious Relations
  • Monographs
  • NTS Insight
  • Policy Reports
  • Working Papers

CO21153 | South Asia’s Trade Policy: Adopt East Asian Approach
Pradumna Bickram Rana

22 October 2021

download pdf

SYNOPSIS

South Asian countries must adopt the East Asian approach of signing free trade agreements (FTAs) to enhance market access and to link their economies to regional and global supply chains. Failure to do so, will adversely affect their relative comparative advantage in markets.


Source: Pixabay

COMMENTARY

REGIONALISM DID not play a role in East Asia’s dynamic growth story, until about two decades ago. With the stalling of the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) Doha Round, however, East Asian countries saw free trade agreements (FTAs) as an alternative approach to liberalising trade and sustaining economic growth in the region.

It was also felt that FTAs could promote deeper integration as compared to the shallower integration of the WTO which mainly tackles “on-the-border” barriers. FTAs could address “behind the border” issues such as rules for protecting investments, intellectual property, environment and labour rights, and regulations on product standards that were relevant to supply chain or “21st century” trade which now constitutes a bulk of global trade.

East Asia’s Response to Trump’s Protectionism

An important risk associated with FTAs is the so-called “spaghetti bowl” effect. This effect arises when overlapping FTAs create a web of trade agreements with different documentation and compliance costs for businesses and negotiation costs for governments.

Firm-level surveys conducted by the Asian Development Bank in six countries, however, found that concerns about the negative effects of the Asian spaghetti bowl were over-stated and that the Asian spaghetti bowl had not unduly affected small and medium-sized traders. There was, therefore, a surge in the number of FTAs signed by the East Asian countries since 2000.

More recently, ASEAN, China, the European Union (EU) and Japan have taken a stand against then President Trump’s “America First” policy and his emphasis on “bilateral and reciprocal trade” and signed a large number of regional and inter-regional FTAs with other trading partners.

Soon after Trump’s inauguration, the European Parliament gave its consent to the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement. The Japan-EU Economic Partnership Agreement came in force on 1 February 2019. The EU approved the EU-Singapore trade pact in February 2019, signed the agreement with Vietnam in June 2019, and is negotiating with Indonesia, Australia, and New Zealand. The EU and China also signed the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment.

Japan has also played a key role in driving the 11-country Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTTP). Recently, China applied to join the CPTPP.

The ASEAN-led Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the largest and broadest — but not the deepest — FTA in the world, was also signed in November 2020. The RCEP was to be effective by end-2021 but this might not happen as COVID-19 has distracted the attention of national legislatures.

China has taken a complementary approach to regionalism, by focusing on infrastructure and physical connectivity. In this regard, President Xi Jinping’s signature project, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), is the main game in town.

South Asian Hesitancy in Signing FTAs

While the East Asian countries are signing FTAs at a fast pace, South Asian countries, including India, have been hesitant to do so. A case in point is India’s opting out of the RCEP literally at the eleventh hour.

This hesitancy is not appropriate as it reduces the relative comparative advantage of a concerned South Asian country vis-a-vis the East Asian member of an FTA whose export basket is similar to that of the South Asian country.

Let us take an example. Both Vietnam and India export apparel, leather goods, footware, and fishery and pharmaceutical products to the EU, and the CPTPP and RCEP countries. Since Vietnam is a member of the regional groupings while India is not, its relative comparative advantage in the commodities mentioned increases while that of India declines.

Similarly, additional foreign direct investment could come in from the EU to the manufacturing and services sectors of Vietnam in order to access the huge RCEP market. The same incentive could also push other RCEP members to invest in Vietnam to improve market access in the EU.

Thus, hesitancy in signing an FTA with the EU and not joining RCEP would have reduced India’s relative comparative advantage vis-a-vis Vietnam in these markets to the detriment of India.

South Asia’s New Trade Policy

Fuelled by the COVID-19 pandemic that has seriously affected their economies and concerns of being shut out of the global economy, several South Asian countries are now fast-tracking FTA negotiations with major trading partners. Two years after opting out of the RCEP, India is now negotiating nearly two dozen FTAs and early harvest deals including those with the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Australia, Canada, and the EU.

India is hoping to conclude an FTA with the UAE and an early harvest deal with Australia by the end of this year. Bangladesh is also negotiating FTAs with Thailand and Singapore.

The reversal of the past go-slow policy on FTA is welcome. But the question still remains on how, going forward, the Indian government will manage domestic concerns including political factionalism that have hamstrung economic reforms.

The RCEP did not happen because of the government’s inability to address domestic concerns. Similarly, the government has been unable to implement the 2020 farm laws, which seeks to promote the much-needed competition in the agriculture sector, because of the strong opposition of the farmers.

About the Author

Pradumna B. Rana is a Senior Fellow with the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS) at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / Regionalism and Multilateralism / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
comments powered by Disqus

SYNOPSIS

South Asian countries must adopt the East Asian approach of signing free trade agreements (FTAs) to enhance market access and to link their economies to regional and global supply chains. Failure to do so, will adversely affect their relative comparative advantage in markets.


Source: Pixabay

COMMENTARY

REGIONALISM DID not play a role in East Asia’s dynamic growth story, until about two decades ago. With the stalling of the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) Doha Round, however, East Asian countries saw free trade agreements (FTAs) as an alternative approach to liberalising trade and sustaining economic growth in the region.

It was also felt that FTAs could promote deeper integration as compared to the shallower integration of the WTO which mainly tackles “on-the-border” barriers. FTAs could address “behind the border” issues such as rules for protecting investments, intellectual property, environment and labour rights, and regulations on product standards that were relevant to supply chain or “21st century” trade which now constitutes a bulk of global trade.

East Asia’s Response to Trump’s Protectionism

An important risk associated with FTAs is the so-called “spaghetti bowl” effect. This effect arises when overlapping FTAs create a web of trade agreements with different documentation and compliance costs for businesses and negotiation costs for governments.

Firm-level surveys conducted by the Asian Development Bank in six countries, however, found that concerns about the negative effects of the Asian spaghetti bowl were over-stated and that the Asian spaghetti bowl had not unduly affected small and medium-sized traders. There was, therefore, a surge in the number of FTAs signed by the East Asian countries since 2000.

More recently, ASEAN, China, the European Union (EU) and Japan have taken a stand against then President Trump’s “America First” policy and his emphasis on “bilateral and reciprocal trade” and signed a large number of regional and inter-regional FTAs with other trading partners.

Soon after Trump’s inauguration, the European Parliament gave its consent to the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement. The Japan-EU Economic Partnership Agreement came in force on 1 February 2019. The EU approved the EU-Singapore trade pact in February 2019, signed the agreement with Vietnam in June 2019, and is negotiating with Indonesia, Australia, and New Zealand. The EU and China also signed the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment.

Japan has also played a key role in driving the 11-country Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTTP). Recently, China applied to join the CPTPP.

The ASEAN-led Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the largest and broadest — but not the deepest — FTA in the world, was also signed in November 2020. The RCEP was to be effective by end-2021 but this might not happen as COVID-19 has distracted the attention of national legislatures.

China has taken a complementary approach to regionalism, by focusing on infrastructure and physical connectivity. In this regard, President Xi Jinping’s signature project, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), is the main game in town.

South Asian Hesitancy in Signing FTAs

While the East Asian countries are signing FTAs at a fast pace, South Asian countries, including India, have been hesitant to do so. A case in point is India’s opting out of the RCEP literally at the eleventh hour.

This hesitancy is not appropriate as it reduces the relative comparative advantage of a concerned South Asian country vis-a-vis the East Asian member of an FTA whose export basket is similar to that of the South Asian country.

Let us take an example. Both Vietnam and India export apparel, leather goods, footware, and fishery and pharmaceutical products to the EU, and the CPTPP and RCEP countries. Since Vietnam is a member of the regional groupings while India is not, its relative comparative advantage in the commodities mentioned increases while that of India declines.

Similarly, additional foreign direct investment could come in from the EU to the manufacturing and services sectors of Vietnam in order to access the huge RCEP market. The same incentive could also push other RCEP members to invest in Vietnam to improve market access in the EU.

Thus, hesitancy in signing an FTA with the EU and not joining RCEP would have reduced India’s relative comparative advantage vis-a-vis Vietnam in these markets to the detriment of India.

South Asia’s New Trade Policy

Fuelled by the COVID-19 pandemic that has seriously affected their economies and concerns of being shut out of the global economy, several South Asian countries are now fast-tracking FTA negotiations with major trading partners. Two years after opting out of the RCEP, India is now negotiating nearly two dozen FTAs and early harvest deals including those with the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Australia, Canada, and the EU.

India is hoping to conclude an FTA with the UAE and an early harvest deal with Australia by the end of this year. Bangladesh is also negotiating FTAs with Thailand and Singapore.

The reversal of the past go-slow policy on FTA is welcome. But the question still remains on how, going forward, the Indian government will manage domestic concerns including political factionalism that have hamstrung economic reforms.

The RCEP did not happen because of the government’s inability to address domestic concerns. Similarly, the government has been unable to implement the 2020 farm laws, which seeks to promote the much-needed competition in the agriculture sector, because of the strong opposition of the farmers.

About the Author

Pradumna B. Rana is a Senior Fellow with the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS) at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / Regionalism and Multilateralism

Popular Links

About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

Connect with Us

rsis.ntu
rsis_ntu
rsisntu
rsisvideocast
school/rsis-ntu
rsis.sg
rsissg
RSIS
RSS
Subscribe to RSIS Publications
Subscribe to RSIS Events

Getting to RSIS

Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B3,
50 Nanyang Avenue,
Singapore 639798

Click here for direction to RSIS

Get in Touch

    Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
    Help us improve

      Rate your experience with this website
      123456
      Not satisfiedVery satisfied
      What did you like?
      0/255 characters
      What can be improved?
      0/255 characters
      Your email
      Please enter a valid email.
      Thank you for your feedback.
      This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
      OK
      Latest Book
      more info