Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • The Duma Elections and Russian Foreign Policy
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO21144 | The Duma Elections and Russian Foreign Policy
    Chris Cheang

    29 September 2021

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    The victory of pro-establishment United Russia (UR) party in the recent Duma elections was never in doubt. It ensures President Putin’s re-run for the presidency and his probable re-election in 2024. Externally, it confirms Russia’s foreign policy course and reinforces the status quo in Russia’s relations with the West and China.


    Source: Kremlin.ru, CC BY 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

    COMMENTARY

    ON 17-19 SEPT 2021, Russia held the Duma (parliamentary) elections in which the pro-establishment United Russia (UR) party expectedly swept back to power. In the last elections in 2016, UR secured 343 out of 450 seats in the Duma and 54% of the vote. This time, with 324 seats and almost 50% of the vote, it has a two-thirds majority, enabling it to enact legislation without the support of the other parties.

    The Communist Party gained nearly 19% of the vote, up from over 13% in 2016. The nationalist Liberal-Democratic Party obtained 7.5% against 13% previously. The Just Russia party scored 7.4% versus over 6% (2016). The new centre-right New People party, considered part of the ‘systemic opposition,’ like the four other parties, received over 5% of the vote. They stand in contrast to the ‘non-systemic opposition’ outside the official political establishment, including those supporting jailed critic, Alexei Navalny.

    Putin’s Eroding or Growing Power Base?

    While the Communists have emerged stronger than in 2016, they are unlikely to pose a real challenge to UR or President Putin, judging by past experience. Ditto for the other systemic opposition parties.

    The socio-economic repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic and perceived abuse of power as well as the cooling of positive national mood since the 2014 annexation of Crimea accounted for UR’s latest electoral performance.

    UR is widely seen as President Putin’s mass power base. While his popularity has lost momentum in recent times, his approval rating remains highest among all politicians. His decision to nominate Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu, both popular personalities, to head the UR candidates’ list for the Duma elections, certainly played a role in the election results.

    Months before, Navalny’s supporters and other non-systemic opposition forces were subjected to perceived state pressure; this factor, together with allegations of electoral fraud, have led some observers to question the results.

    On the other hand, the Russian electorate remains largely conservative and wary of abrupt political change. The voters generally favour stability and the status quo, which UR and the other systemic opposition parties represent.

    The elections provided the country with the last barometer of public opinion before the presidential elections in March 2024. UR’s victory will strengthen Putin’s political support in the Duma.

    Impact on Foreign policy

    The systemic opposition parties and electorate support Putin’s foreign policy.

    The West

    Relations with the United States remain strained and marked by mutual suspicion, tension, and hostility. For the next few years at least, it is difficult to conceive of a situation in which a genuine relaxation can come about, unless both sides are able and willing to compromise on their core interests and values.

    US sanctions, concern over the growing Russian-Chinese relationship, and perceived Russian interference in the US electoral process will continue to trouble their ties.

    With the EU, ties remain strained over Ukraine and Crimea; perceived mutual interference in each other’s domestic politics; Russian support of President Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus, Syria; and EU sanctions. Angela Merkel’s departure from the political stage in Germany, EU’s economically most powerful state, presents Russia with the greatest foreign policy challenge as Merkel has been a leading advocate of dialogue and cooperation with Russia.

    This is epitomised by her unyielding support of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project, in tandem with strong sanctions against Russia, on account of its annexation of Crimea and support of Ukrainian separatists. The German elections on 26 September 2021 have resulted in a new leadership which the Russians are unfamiliar with.

    China

    Relations with China have reached a high point in recent years and are crucial to Russia. China is now a vital customer of Russian energy exports, and an increasingly important economic partner. China’s economic and military weight adds considerably to Russia’s strategic positioning vis-à-vis the US.

    Yet, this is unlikely to lead to any formal, alliance-type relationship. Memories of failed Sino-Soviet strategic efforts of the past linger on. Perhaps more visceral is the cultural and racial gulf between the two populations; it is too wide to be bridged by their mutual suspicion of and making common cause against the US.

    While historical grievances over their common border have been formally resolved, they remain in the consciousness of Chinese netizens, a fact judiciously pointed out by a prominent Russian observer, Alexander Lukin in a 22 September 2021 article on Russian-Chinese relations published in The Washington Quarterly.

    Lukin stated: “In July 2020, Russian media and society reacted nervously to a surge of Chinese nationalism caused by a video posted on the official Weibo account of the Russian embassy in China. It was on the 160th anniversary of the city of Vladivostok. Many Chinese netizens, including Global Times editor Hu Xijin himself, criticised Russia.”

    They claimed that Russians did not found the city but annexed and renamed the Chinese settlement of Haishenwai in an unequal treaty in 1860. To Lukin, all this shows that Russian-Chinese relations are changing.

    Central Asia, Arctic

    There are also underlying differences in Central Asia and the Arctic. Historically, Central Asia was part of the Tsarist Empire, later the USSR, and remained under Russian influence in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), after the USSR’s collapse.

    In recent years, however, China’s economic weight, through bilateral economic interaction and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), appears to have weakened Russian influence in Central Asia.

    In the Arctic, China’s growing interest is seen in the region’s vast energy resources and its possible development into an alternative maritime route between Asia and Europe, symbolised by Russia’s declared objective of developing the Northern Sea Route. This complements Moscow’s own interest.

    However, Beijing’s ambition of an inclusive approach to managing Arctic issues is seen with trepidation in Moscow. Russia would like to confine the management of the region to the five Arctic states, namely, Canada, Norway, the US, Denmark, and Russia itself.

    Afghanistan

    Russian security and foreign policy interests were not served with the return of the Taliban in Afghanistan. Russia now faces the task of ensuring that its security and that of its Central Asian allies will not be compromised by the Taliban government in Kabul. Russia’s underlying fear is that ISIS and Al Qaeda might regain their past foothold in Afghanistan.

    Geographical proximity, and longstanding historical, political, economic and security ties with Central Asia will not allow Russia to ignore the implications of an unstable Afghanistan. Yet, the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan was costly and unsuccessful and that experience presents a strategic dilemma for President Putin.

    Putin’s Challenge Ahead

    The COVID-19 pandemic remains a huge domestic challenge for Putin. Nevertheless, Russia’s image and foreign policy have received a fillip. Its Sputnik V vaccine has reportedly been authorised in 70 countries worldwide, as of September 2021. The question is whether this would translate into tangible and longer-term economic, political and strategic gains for Russia.

    To sum up, Russia’s international image has not suffered irreparably from its policies or actions of recent years. Its links with a rising China ensure that its crucial eastern flank is secured, and its energy resources have a reliable customer in Beijing.

    Yet, its interaction and relationship with the US and the West leave much to be desired. Thanks to its close cultural, racial, historical, and traditional links with Europe, Russia remains Euro/Western-centric in its outlook and orientation.

    For Moscow, to establish a closer relationship with China and the Asia-Pacific, which are still largely alien to members of the Russian political and business elite, would be a tall order, which they are not only not inclined to but would be unable to achieve. Therein lies the challenge facing President Putin and his officials in the foreseeable future.

    About the Author

    Christopher Cheang is a Senior Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Europe / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    The victory of pro-establishment United Russia (UR) party in the recent Duma elections was never in doubt. It ensures President Putin’s re-run for the presidency and his probable re-election in 2024. Externally, it confirms Russia’s foreign policy course and reinforces the status quo in Russia’s relations with the West and China.


    Source: Kremlin.ru, CC BY 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

    COMMENTARY

    ON 17-19 SEPT 2021, Russia held the Duma (parliamentary) elections in which the pro-establishment United Russia (UR) party expectedly swept back to power. In the last elections in 2016, UR secured 343 out of 450 seats in the Duma and 54% of the vote. This time, with 324 seats and almost 50% of the vote, it has a two-thirds majority, enabling it to enact legislation without the support of the other parties.

    The Communist Party gained nearly 19% of the vote, up from over 13% in 2016. The nationalist Liberal-Democratic Party obtained 7.5% against 13% previously. The Just Russia party scored 7.4% versus over 6% (2016). The new centre-right New People party, considered part of the ‘systemic opposition,’ like the four other parties, received over 5% of the vote. They stand in contrast to the ‘non-systemic opposition’ outside the official political establishment, including those supporting jailed critic, Alexei Navalny.

    Putin’s Eroding or Growing Power Base?

    While the Communists have emerged stronger than in 2016, they are unlikely to pose a real challenge to UR or President Putin, judging by past experience. Ditto for the other systemic opposition parties.

    The socio-economic repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic and perceived abuse of power as well as the cooling of positive national mood since the 2014 annexation of Crimea accounted for UR’s latest electoral performance.

    UR is widely seen as President Putin’s mass power base. While his popularity has lost momentum in recent times, his approval rating remains highest among all politicians. His decision to nominate Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu, both popular personalities, to head the UR candidates’ list for the Duma elections, certainly played a role in the election results.

    Months before, Navalny’s supporters and other non-systemic opposition forces were subjected to perceived state pressure; this factor, together with allegations of electoral fraud, have led some observers to question the results.

    On the other hand, the Russian electorate remains largely conservative and wary of abrupt political change. The voters generally favour stability and the status quo, which UR and the other systemic opposition parties represent.

    The elections provided the country with the last barometer of public opinion before the presidential elections in March 2024. UR’s victory will strengthen Putin’s political support in the Duma.

    Impact on Foreign policy

    The systemic opposition parties and electorate support Putin’s foreign policy.

    The West

    Relations with the United States remain strained and marked by mutual suspicion, tension, and hostility. For the next few years at least, it is difficult to conceive of a situation in which a genuine relaxation can come about, unless both sides are able and willing to compromise on their core interests and values.

    US sanctions, concern over the growing Russian-Chinese relationship, and perceived Russian interference in the US electoral process will continue to trouble their ties.

    With the EU, ties remain strained over Ukraine and Crimea; perceived mutual interference in each other’s domestic politics; Russian support of President Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus, Syria; and EU sanctions. Angela Merkel’s departure from the political stage in Germany, EU’s economically most powerful state, presents Russia with the greatest foreign policy challenge as Merkel has been a leading advocate of dialogue and cooperation with Russia.

    This is epitomised by her unyielding support of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project, in tandem with strong sanctions against Russia, on account of its annexation of Crimea and support of Ukrainian separatists. The German elections on 26 September 2021 have resulted in a new leadership which the Russians are unfamiliar with.

    China

    Relations with China have reached a high point in recent years and are crucial to Russia. China is now a vital customer of Russian energy exports, and an increasingly important economic partner. China’s economic and military weight adds considerably to Russia’s strategic positioning vis-à-vis the US.

    Yet, this is unlikely to lead to any formal, alliance-type relationship. Memories of failed Sino-Soviet strategic efforts of the past linger on. Perhaps more visceral is the cultural and racial gulf between the two populations; it is too wide to be bridged by their mutual suspicion of and making common cause against the US.

    While historical grievances over their common border have been formally resolved, they remain in the consciousness of Chinese netizens, a fact judiciously pointed out by a prominent Russian observer, Alexander Lukin in a 22 September 2021 article on Russian-Chinese relations published in The Washington Quarterly.

    Lukin stated: “In July 2020, Russian media and society reacted nervously to a surge of Chinese nationalism caused by a video posted on the official Weibo account of the Russian embassy in China. It was on the 160th anniversary of the city of Vladivostok. Many Chinese netizens, including Global Times editor Hu Xijin himself, criticised Russia.”

    They claimed that Russians did not found the city but annexed and renamed the Chinese settlement of Haishenwai in an unequal treaty in 1860. To Lukin, all this shows that Russian-Chinese relations are changing.

    Central Asia, Arctic

    There are also underlying differences in Central Asia and the Arctic. Historically, Central Asia was part of the Tsarist Empire, later the USSR, and remained under Russian influence in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), after the USSR’s collapse.

    In recent years, however, China’s economic weight, through bilateral economic interaction and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), appears to have weakened Russian influence in Central Asia.

    In the Arctic, China’s growing interest is seen in the region’s vast energy resources and its possible development into an alternative maritime route between Asia and Europe, symbolised by Russia’s declared objective of developing the Northern Sea Route. This complements Moscow’s own interest.

    However, Beijing’s ambition of an inclusive approach to managing Arctic issues is seen with trepidation in Moscow. Russia would like to confine the management of the region to the five Arctic states, namely, Canada, Norway, the US, Denmark, and Russia itself.

    Afghanistan

    Russian security and foreign policy interests were not served with the return of the Taliban in Afghanistan. Russia now faces the task of ensuring that its security and that of its Central Asian allies will not be compromised by the Taliban government in Kabul. Russia’s underlying fear is that ISIS and Al Qaeda might regain their past foothold in Afghanistan.

    Geographical proximity, and longstanding historical, political, economic and security ties with Central Asia will not allow Russia to ignore the implications of an unstable Afghanistan. Yet, the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan was costly and unsuccessful and that experience presents a strategic dilemma for President Putin.

    Putin’s Challenge Ahead

    The COVID-19 pandemic remains a huge domestic challenge for Putin. Nevertheless, Russia’s image and foreign policy have received a fillip. Its Sputnik V vaccine has reportedly been authorised in 70 countries worldwide, as of September 2021. The question is whether this would translate into tangible and longer-term economic, political and strategic gains for Russia.

    To sum up, Russia’s international image has not suffered irreparably from its policies or actions of recent years. Its links with a rising China ensure that its crucial eastern flank is secured, and its energy resources have a reliable customer in Beijing.

    Yet, its interaction and relationship with the US and the West leave much to be desired. Thanks to its close cultural, racial, historical, and traditional links with Europe, Russia remains Euro/Western-centric in its outlook and orientation.

    For Moscow, to establish a closer relationship with China and the Asia-Pacific, which are still largely alien to members of the Russian political and business elite, would be a tall order, which they are not only not inclined to but would be unable to achieve. Therein lies the challenge facing President Putin and his officials in the foreseeable future.

    About the Author

    Christopher Cheang is a Senior Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info