Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • The Rohingya Crisis: No End in Sight
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO23126 | The Rohingya Crisis: No End in Sight
    Tahsina Ahmed

    05 September 2023

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    Since 2017, more than 1.2 million Rohingyas have been living a precarious existence as refugees in southeastern Bangladesh ever since they were forced to leave their homes in Myanmar. All efforts to facilitate their return have not yielded positive results. Their plight will persist unless the international community step up its efforts to build more confidence and trust among the communities involved and push forward in a systematic way with increased multi-stakeholder participation.

    230905 CO23126 The Rohingya Crisis No End in Sight
    Source: Masum-al-hasan Rocky on Wikimedia

    COMMENTARY

    25 August 2023 marked the sixth anniversary of the mass expulsion of the Rohingya people from their homeland by the Myanmar Armed Forces (the Tatmadaw). For six years now, more than 1.2 million Rohingyas have been living in southeastern Bangladesh as refugees, leading precarious and insecure lives. They face an uncertain future as Bangladesh, which has social, economic, political, security and environmental problems of its own, lacks the wherewithal to accommodate them.

    Despite several attempts, including the recent pilot project under which a group of Myanmar nationals will return to their homeland to be followed by successive batches, the repatriation issue is stagnated and at a dead end, placing Bangladesh in a predicament. The lack of urgent action by the international community, the politics of humanitarian agencies, coupled with the reluctance among the Rohingyas to return home, have emboldened the Myanmar officials to dodge the issue when dealing with their Bangladeshi counterparts.

    As things stand, the Rohingyas have very few options except wait in forlorn hope of deliverance from their sufferings amid the indifference of the international community. Big-power rivalries, notably the geopolitical competition and tensions between China and the United States of America, the COVID-19 recovery efforts around the world, and the rapidly deteriorating political-military situation in Myanmar are drawing attention and resources away from what is happening at the borders between Bangladesh and Myanmar.

    The Rohingya refugee crisis began on 25 August 2017 when the Tatmadaw launched a “clearance operation” – essentially a well-planned campaign of ethnic cleansing – against the Rohingyas in northern Rakhine State. Media reports estimated that during the campaign, some 25,000 Rohingyas were massacred, thousands of women and adolescents sexually assaulted, and more than 700,000 Rohingyas forced to flee into Bangladesh, joining some 200,000-250,000 Rohingyas who had arrived earlier in several waves (beginning in 1978) after their expulsion from Myanmar. The United Nations has described the post-2017 Tatmadaw persecution of the Rohingyas as a “textbook example of ethnic cleansing”.

    Indifference of the International Community

    When the current Rohingya crisis started in August 2017, it attracted the attention of the international community for a brief period of time. The international community, with the US and several Western states at the forefront, initially played an important role providing humanitarian assistance to the Rohingyas. However, this interest waned and the Rohingya crisis was side-lined as a result of pressing issues such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine where war continues till today.

    The growing indifference of the international community towards the plight of the Rohingyas is reflected, first and foremost, in the disbursement of aid. Over the last six years, the provision of funds for the refugees has declined drastically. For example, in 2022, only 63.8 per cent of the US$881 million required for the refugees were collected. In the first half of 2023, only 24.6 per cent of the required $876 million were raised. A number of international donors, including the United Kingdom, have significantly reduced their aid. British aid for the refugees dropped from £112.36 million in 2019-2020 to £20.26 million in 2022-2023, a decline of 83 per cent.

    In addition, the World Food Programme (WFP) has been compelled to slash its food support for the Rohingyas twice in the first half of 2023, citing a funding shortfall of US$125 million. The WFP subsequently decided to slash its monthly food vouchers for the refugees from US$12 to US$10 and to US$8 per person, with deleterious effects on the health of the refugees, besides secondary effects, such as an increase in illegal activities including illegal employment.

    Besides the decline in funding support for the Rohingyas, the lack of attention from the international actors have prevented any resolution of the protracted crisis. Russia, China and India have shielded Myanmar’s ethnic cleansing from international opprobrium, while Japan, Thailand and Singapore have continued to trade with and invest in Myanmar.

    Although the US, UK and some other Western states undertook actions against Myanmar, including the condemnation of the Tatmadaw’s atrocities, the imposition of targeted sanctions on Myanmar officials, and the designation of the atrocities as a genocide, they did not exert significant pressure on Myanmar to resolve the Rohingya crisis during the years up to the 2021 military coup d’état in Myanmar.

    In fact, after the 2021 coup which deposed the democratically-elected government led by Aung San Suu Kyi and the subsequent hardening of the West’s position on Myanmar, the Rohingyas have remained marginal to their broader approach towards the country. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation, represented by Gambia, filed a case against Myanmar at the International Court of Justice, but the case has been dragging on and has not been able to change the situation on the ground.

    More can be done for Rohingya Refugees

    The indifference of the international community, coupled with the understandable reluctance among the Rohingyas to return home, emboldened the Myanmar government to dodge the issue when dealing with Bangladesh. Among the major players, only China seems to have been more active in pursuing a mediatory role between Bangladesh and Myanmar to kick off the process of refugee repatriation.

    Two attempts at repatriation in 2018 and 2019 ended in failure, and the pilot project for Rohingya repatriation scheduled to start in April 2023 has stalled as well. These failures can be attributed to the reluctance of the Rohingyas to return to Myanmar without guarantees of citizenship and safety, and to Myanmar’s reluctance to take back its own people. More importantly, the Tatmadaw sees no unbearable pressure from other states and international bodies to embark on resettling the Rohingyas.

    Furthermore, while the non-governmental organisations that are active among the Rohingyas have been commended for their humanitarian activities, they have also been accused of discouraging them from agreeing to repatriation. This has created conditions where refugees fall into the hands of criminal gangs, drug cartels, trafficking groups, and terrorist outfits on both sides of the border and beyond. Rohingyas, unemployed and without any future prospects, have become easy prey to drug dealers and made to serve as couriers to smuggle drugs into Bangladesh.

    The safe, voluntary and dignified repatriation of the Rohingya refugees to Myanmar is the only solution to the protracted crisis. Bangladesh, with its burgeoning population, does not have the capacity to absorb them, while third countries are mostly unwilling to take in large numbers of refugees except for token gestures from the US, Canada and Japan. To many in these developed countries, the crisis originated in Myanmar and has to be solved inside Myanmar.

    Bangladesh, while doing its best to resolve the Rohingya crisis, has so far seen very limited success in the repatriation of the refugees. Dhaka should therefore ramp up its diplomacy to re-energise the international community and to urge both Western and non-Western countries to use their political and diplomatic leverage over Myanmar so as to step up the process of repatriation and to provide much-needed funds for the Rohingyas.

    Simultaneously, the international community should continue to negotiate with the Tatmadaw since it controls the ground situation in parts of the Rakhine State, and engage with other stakeholders inside Myanmar, such as the National Unity Government and the Arakan Army, to find a solution to the crisis.

    So far, the international community has undertaken few significant steps to address the Rohingya crisis in a long-term manner although it has the capability to do much more. It can act more collectively and systematically to instil confidence and trust in joint initiatives among governments, civil society, and even the business community to bring about a solution to the Rohingya crisis.

    About the Author

    Tahsina Ahmed is a doctoral researcher on security, peace and conflict in South and Southeast Asia at Duke University in the United States of America.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / International Politics and Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    Since 2017, more than 1.2 million Rohingyas have been living a precarious existence as refugees in southeastern Bangladesh ever since they were forced to leave their homes in Myanmar. All efforts to facilitate their return have not yielded positive results. Their plight will persist unless the international community step up its efforts to build more confidence and trust among the communities involved and push forward in a systematic way with increased multi-stakeholder participation.

    230905 CO23126 The Rohingya Crisis No End in Sight
    Source: Masum-al-hasan Rocky on Wikimedia

    COMMENTARY

    25 August 2023 marked the sixth anniversary of the mass expulsion of the Rohingya people from their homeland by the Myanmar Armed Forces (the Tatmadaw). For six years now, more than 1.2 million Rohingyas have been living in southeastern Bangladesh as refugees, leading precarious and insecure lives. They face an uncertain future as Bangladesh, which has social, economic, political, security and environmental problems of its own, lacks the wherewithal to accommodate them.

    Despite several attempts, including the recent pilot project under which a group of Myanmar nationals will return to their homeland to be followed by successive batches, the repatriation issue is stagnated and at a dead end, placing Bangladesh in a predicament. The lack of urgent action by the international community, the politics of humanitarian agencies, coupled with the reluctance among the Rohingyas to return home, have emboldened the Myanmar officials to dodge the issue when dealing with their Bangladeshi counterparts.

    As things stand, the Rohingyas have very few options except wait in forlorn hope of deliverance from their sufferings amid the indifference of the international community. Big-power rivalries, notably the geopolitical competition and tensions between China and the United States of America, the COVID-19 recovery efforts around the world, and the rapidly deteriorating political-military situation in Myanmar are drawing attention and resources away from what is happening at the borders between Bangladesh and Myanmar.

    The Rohingya refugee crisis began on 25 August 2017 when the Tatmadaw launched a “clearance operation” – essentially a well-planned campaign of ethnic cleansing – against the Rohingyas in northern Rakhine State. Media reports estimated that during the campaign, some 25,000 Rohingyas were massacred, thousands of women and adolescents sexually assaulted, and more than 700,000 Rohingyas forced to flee into Bangladesh, joining some 200,000-250,000 Rohingyas who had arrived earlier in several waves (beginning in 1978) after their expulsion from Myanmar. The United Nations has described the post-2017 Tatmadaw persecution of the Rohingyas as a “textbook example of ethnic cleansing”.

    Indifference of the International Community

    When the current Rohingya crisis started in August 2017, it attracted the attention of the international community for a brief period of time. The international community, with the US and several Western states at the forefront, initially played an important role providing humanitarian assistance to the Rohingyas. However, this interest waned and the Rohingya crisis was side-lined as a result of pressing issues such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine where war continues till today.

    The growing indifference of the international community towards the plight of the Rohingyas is reflected, first and foremost, in the disbursement of aid. Over the last six years, the provision of funds for the refugees has declined drastically. For example, in 2022, only 63.8 per cent of the US$881 million required for the refugees were collected. In the first half of 2023, only 24.6 per cent of the required $876 million were raised. A number of international donors, including the United Kingdom, have significantly reduced their aid. British aid for the refugees dropped from £112.36 million in 2019-2020 to £20.26 million in 2022-2023, a decline of 83 per cent.

    In addition, the World Food Programme (WFP) has been compelled to slash its food support for the Rohingyas twice in the first half of 2023, citing a funding shortfall of US$125 million. The WFP subsequently decided to slash its monthly food vouchers for the refugees from US$12 to US$10 and to US$8 per person, with deleterious effects on the health of the refugees, besides secondary effects, such as an increase in illegal activities including illegal employment.

    Besides the decline in funding support for the Rohingyas, the lack of attention from the international actors have prevented any resolution of the protracted crisis. Russia, China and India have shielded Myanmar’s ethnic cleansing from international opprobrium, while Japan, Thailand and Singapore have continued to trade with and invest in Myanmar.

    Although the US, UK and some other Western states undertook actions against Myanmar, including the condemnation of the Tatmadaw’s atrocities, the imposition of targeted sanctions on Myanmar officials, and the designation of the atrocities as a genocide, they did not exert significant pressure on Myanmar to resolve the Rohingya crisis during the years up to the 2021 military coup d’état in Myanmar.

    In fact, after the 2021 coup which deposed the democratically-elected government led by Aung San Suu Kyi and the subsequent hardening of the West’s position on Myanmar, the Rohingyas have remained marginal to their broader approach towards the country. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation, represented by Gambia, filed a case against Myanmar at the International Court of Justice, but the case has been dragging on and has not been able to change the situation on the ground.

    More can be done for Rohingya Refugees

    The indifference of the international community, coupled with the understandable reluctance among the Rohingyas to return home, emboldened the Myanmar government to dodge the issue when dealing with Bangladesh. Among the major players, only China seems to have been more active in pursuing a mediatory role between Bangladesh and Myanmar to kick off the process of refugee repatriation.

    Two attempts at repatriation in 2018 and 2019 ended in failure, and the pilot project for Rohingya repatriation scheduled to start in April 2023 has stalled as well. These failures can be attributed to the reluctance of the Rohingyas to return to Myanmar without guarantees of citizenship and safety, and to Myanmar’s reluctance to take back its own people. More importantly, the Tatmadaw sees no unbearable pressure from other states and international bodies to embark on resettling the Rohingyas.

    Furthermore, while the non-governmental organisations that are active among the Rohingyas have been commended for their humanitarian activities, they have also been accused of discouraging them from agreeing to repatriation. This has created conditions where refugees fall into the hands of criminal gangs, drug cartels, trafficking groups, and terrorist outfits on both sides of the border and beyond. Rohingyas, unemployed and without any future prospects, have become easy prey to drug dealers and made to serve as couriers to smuggle drugs into Bangladesh.

    The safe, voluntary and dignified repatriation of the Rohingya refugees to Myanmar is the only solution to the protracted crisis. Bangladesh, with its burgeoning population, does not have the capacity to absorb them, while third countries are mostly unwilling to take in large numbers of refugees except for token gestures from the US, Canada and Japan. To many in these developed countries, the crisis originated in Myanmar and has to be solved inside Myanmar.

    Bangladesh, while doing its best to resolve the Rohingya crisis, has so far seen very limited success in the repatriation of the refugees. Dhaka should therefore ramp up its diplomacy to re-energise the international community and to urge both Western and non-Western countries to use their political and diplomatic leverage over Myanmar so as to step up the process of repatriation and to provide much-needed funds for the Rohingyas.

    Simultaneously, the international community should continue to negotiate with the Tatmadaw since it controls the ground situation in parts of the Rakhine State, and engage with other stakeholders inside Myanmar, such as the National Unity Government and the Arakan Army, to find a solution to the crisis.

    So far, the international community has undertaken few significant steps to address the Rohingya crisis in a long-term manner although it has the capability to do much more. It can act more collectively and systematically to instil confidence and trust in joint initiatives among governments, civil society, and even the business community to bring about a solution to the Rohingya crisis.

    About the Author

    Tahsina Ahmed is a doctoral researcher on security, peace and conflict in South and Southeast Asia at Duke University in the United States of America.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Political Economy / International Politics and Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info