Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Space, Gender, and Social Cohesion
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO22086 | Space, Gender, and Social Cohesion
    Elizabeth Harris

    31 August 2022

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    Space can be exclusive or inclusive. It can embrace difference and alternative histories – those of subaltern groups, women, men, and minority religious groups – or it can exclude these.

    john simitopoulos ES2wTd6wztQ unsplash
    Source: Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    Earlier this year, a spontaneous protest movement grew in Sri Lanka, in the context of the economic crisis there. In Colombo, the protesters gathered at Galle Face Green, an open area bordering the sea. One of their posters proclaimed:

    “First, they made us fear the Tamils. Next, they made us hate the Muslims. Then they killed the Catholics. Today we are here as one to chase [away] the racists.”

    The protesters, men and women, often young, came from all the religious and ethnic groups in Sri Lanka to embody this message non-violently. They were signaling that the ethnic and religious sectarianism of the past, which had divided the different communities of Sri Lanka, had to be transcended if the country were to become a cohesive society.

    Galle Face Green, under British rule, was mainly the preserve of the British. It was used variously as a racecourse and an esplanade for leisurely walks or rides. Sri Lankans were largely excluded from these sport and leisure pursuits.

    After independence, in 1948, Galle Face Green became a locus of political protest. In 1957, one of the first acts of violence against the Tamil minority occurred when members of the Tamil Federal Party protested peacefully there against the Official Language Act No. 33, which made Sinhala the official language of the country, linguistically crippling Tamil communities. Sinhala mobs violently broke up the protest before the police eventually stepped in. Galle Face Green was not a random space for such protests. It was chosen because of its visibility and its symbolic value.

    When space is used to exclude others, there is often a “mythic imaginary” behind it, conditioned by religious texts or traditional narratives. In Sri Lanka, many within the Sinhala majority believe that the island is holy to the Buddha. Narratives within Sri Lanka’s historical chronicles reinforce this, surrounding the island with events connected with Buddhism. Religious and ethnic minorities have traditionally been welcome if they accepted the subordination that such an imaginary requires. Several decades of ethnic war resulted when some Tamils, particularly the young, refused to tolerate this.

    In Israel, the building of Jewish settlements on the West Bank is partly driven by the conviction that Jews have a divine right to the land, because of narratives in the Hebrew Bible. Exclusion of those seen to be “other,” namely the Palestinians, has resulted. In such contexts, religious texts and traditional narratives are held by some to have more authority than international law.

    Unraveling Sacred Spaces

    Space is potent because it bears the weight of worldviews and imaginaries that define the identities of different ethnic and religious groups within pluralistic societies. After war or conflict, returning displaced communities often rebuild places of worship first, to reinforce their sense of identity as a religious community. This is more important than rebuilding homes.

    In the West, as cities have become more ethnically and religiously plural, the negotiation of urban space to allow the expression of different identities has not been easy. Mosques, Chinese and Hindu temples, and Sikh places of worship have been seen by some as encroachments on the “Christian” nature of Western culture.

    In Switzerland, in 2009, the building of new minarets was banned after a referendum on the issue, not because minarets in themselves were opposed but because of what they represented for many Swiss people, namely a religion that seemed to subordinate women and punish offences such as adultery in an unacceptable way.

    Muslims would rightly not have accepted this representation. Nevertheless, patterns of spatial inclusion and exclusion are present not only between religious and ethnic groups but also within them, often as the result of specific prejudices.

    In Durham Cathedral in the United Kingdom, there is a black line across the floor towards the back of the building. In the medieval period, women were kept behind the line, at the back of the building, forbidden from moving closer to visit the tomb of St. Cuthbert, although a chapel for their use was eventually allowed.

    The same pattern can be seen in several other religions, often in violation of their founding tenets. In Sri Lanka, Buddhist women have pointed out that they are rarely allowed to carry the holy relics held within temples, when these relics are taken out in religious ceremonies. In Hindu traditions, women have traditionally been seen as emotionally susceptible and impure when they are menstruating and have been debarred from entering the holiest parts of their temples.

    Expressing Prejudices through Space

    In most of these instances, patriarchal attitudes towards women have a spatial expression. Authority within religious, political and ethnic groups is also expressed in space, for instance when photo opportunities reveal a line of male leaders at important events. Space is gendered, conditioned by exclusion or subordination. Some religious and political groups have tried to change this.

    In some Christian churches, women can gain ordination as priests and can become bishops. In some Mahayana Buddhist traditions, women continue to have access to higher ordination as bhikśuṇīs (Sanskrit: nuns). However, this is not true across the board.

    In Theravada Buddhist countries (e.g., Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Thailand), women cannot officially gain higher ordination, although some live as contemporary nuns and some have gained higher ordination through Mahayana nuns. In the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches, women are debarred from becoming priests. This does not mean that influential women leaders have been absent; while sometimes subordinated, we must acknowledge differences and changes over time, that sometimes accord women more visible and substantive roles in their respective communities.

    Spatial Narratives Shape Cohesive Societies

    The narratives and imaginaries that inform our plural societies, therefore, have material, spatial dimensions that have considerable impact on whether a society is cohesive, and enables a coexistence that respects and celebrates difference. Where traditional narratives exclude or subordinate others on the basis of ethnicity, religion or gender, these need to be supplanted or challenged by narratives that promote inclusion rather than exclusion.

    Such narratives, their relevance and contemporary applications can be scrutinized through the lens of international law and technological advancement. For example, in an increasingly digitalised world with widespread use of smart phones, exclusion or inclusion no longer needs physical space. Yet, the significance of spatial exclusion as a contributing factor to conflict will not go away quickly.

    About the Author

    Dr. Elizabeth Harris is an Honorary Senior Research Fellow, Edward Cadbury Centre for the Public Understanding of Religion, University of Birmingham, U.K. She has been committed to inter-religious understanding and encounter for over thirty years, both in Britain and in countries where religion has been implicated in violent conflict. This is part of a series leading up to the International Conference on Cohesive Societies 2022.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / General / Country and Region Studies / Non-Traditional Security / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Religion in Contemporary Society / Singapore and Homeland Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    Space can be exclusive or inclusive. It can embrace difference and alternative histories – those of subaltern groups, women, men, and minority religious groups – or it can exclude these.

    john simitopoulos ES2wTd6wztQ unsplash
    Source: Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    Earlier this year, a spontaneous protest movement grew in Sri Lanka, in the context of the economic crisis there. In Colombo, the protesters gathered at Galle Face Green, an open area bordering the sea. One of their posters proclaimed:

    “First, they made us fear the Tamils. Next, they made us hate the Muslims. Then they killed the Catholics. Today we are here as one to chase [away] the racists.”

    The protesters, men and women, often young, came from all the religious and ethnic groups in Sri Lanka to embody this message non-violently. They were signaling that the ethnic and religious sectarianism of the past, which had divided the different communities of Sri Lanka, had to be transcended if the country were to become a cohesive society.

    Galle Face Green, under British rule, was mainly the preserve of the British. It was used variously as a racecourse and an esplanade for leisurely walks or rides. Sri Lankans were largely excluded from these sport and leisure pursuits.

    After independence, in 1948, Galle Face Green became a locus of political protest. In 1957, one of the first acts of violence against the Tamil minority occurred when members of the Tamil Federal Party protested peacefully there against the Official Language Act No. 33, which made Sinhala the official language of the country, linguistically crippling Tamil communities. Sinhala mobs violently broke up the protest before the police eventually stepped in. Galle Face Green was not a random space for such protests. It was chosen because of its visibility and its symbolic value.

    When space is used to exclude others, there is often a “mythic imaginary” behind it, conditioned by religious texts or traditional narratives. In Sri Lanka, many within the Sinhala majority believe that the island is holy to the Buddha. Narratives within Sri Lanka’s historical chronicles reinforce this, surrounding the island with events connected with Buddhism. Religious and ethnic minorities have traditionally been welcome if they accepted the subordination that such an imaginary requires. Several decades of ethnic war resulted when some Tamils, particularly the young, refused to tolerate this.

    In Israel, the building of Jewish settlements on the West Bank is partly driven by the conviction that Jews have a divine right to the land, because of narratives in the Hebrew Bible. Exclusion of those seen to be “other,” namely the Palestinians, has resulted. In such contexts, religious texts and traditional narratives are held by some to have more authority than international law.

    Unraveling Sacred Spaces

    Space is potent because it bears the weight of worldviews and imaginaries that define the identities of different ethnic and religious groups within pluralistic societies. After war or conflict, returning displaced communities often rebuild places of worship first, to reinforce their sense of identity as a religious community. This is more important than rebuilding homes.

    In the West, as cities have become more ethnically and religiously plural, the negotiation of urban space to allow the expression of different identities has not been easy. Mosques, Chinese and Hindu temples, and Sikh places of worship have been seen by some as encroachments on the “Christian” nature of Western culture.

    In Switzerland, in 2009, the building of new minarets was banned after a referendum on the issue, not because minarets in themselves were opposed but because of what they represented for many Swiss people, namely a religion that seemed to subordinate women and punish offences such as adultery in an unacceptable way.

    Muslims would rightly not have accepted this representation. Nevertheless, patterns of spatial inclusion and exclusion are present not only between religious and ethnic groups but also within them, often as the result of specific prejudices.

    In Durham Cathedral in the United Kingdom, there is a black line across the floor towards the back of the building. In the medieval period, women were kept behind the line, at the back of the building, forbidden from moving closer to visit the tomb of St. Cuthbert, although a chapel for their use was eventually allowed.

    The same pattern can be seen in several other religions, often in violation of their founding tenets. In Sri Lanka, Buddhist women have pointed out that they are rarely allowed to carry the holy relics held within temples, when these relics are taken out in religious ceremonies. In Hindu traditions, women have traditionally been seen as emotionally susceptible and impure when they are menstruating and have been debarred from entering the holiest parts of their temples.

    Expressing Prejudices through Space

    In most of these instances, patriarchal attitudes towards women have a spatial expression. Authority within religious, political and ethnic groups is also expressed in space, for instance when photo opportunities reveal a line of male leaders at important events. Space is gendered, conditioned by exclusion or subordination. Some religious and political groups have tried to change this.

    In some Christian churches, women can gain ordination as priests and can become bishops. In some Mahayana Buddhist traditions, women continue to have access to higher ordination as bhikśuṇīs (Sanskrit: nuns). However, this is not true across the board.

    In Theravada Buddhist countries (e.g., Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Thailand), women cannot officially gain higher ordination, although some live as contemporary nuns and some have gained higher ordination through Mahayana nuns. In the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches, women are debarred from becoming priests. This does not mean that influential women leaders have been absent; while sometimes subordinated, we must acknowledge differences and changes over time, that sometimes accord women more visible and substantive roles in their respective communities.

    Spatial Narratives Shape Cohesive Societies

    The narratives and imaginaries that inform our plural societies, therefore, have material, spatial dimensions that have considerable impact on whether a society is cohesive, and enables a coexistence that respects and celebrates difference. Where traditional narratives exclude or subordinate others on the basis of ethnicity, religion or gender, these need to be supplanted or challenged by narratives that promote inclusion rather than exclusion.

    Such narratives, their relevance and contemporary applications can be scrutinized through the lens of international law and technological advancement. For example, in an increasingly digitalised world with widespread use of smart phones, exclusion or inclusion no longer needs physical space. Yet, the significance of spatial exclusion as a contributing factor to conflict will not go away quickly.

    About the Author

    Dr. Elizabeth Harris is an Honorary Senior Research Fellow, Edward Cadbury Centre for the Public Understanding of Religion, University of Birmingham, U.K. She has been committed to inter-religious understanding and encounter for over thirty years, both in Britain and in countries where religion has been implicated in violent conflict. This is part of a series leading up to the International Conference on Cohesive Societies 2022.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / General / Country and Region Studies / Non-Traditional Security / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Religion in Contemporary Society / Singapore and Homeland Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info