Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Undi18: Youth Vote Only Part of Story
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO22001 | Undi18: Youth Vote Only Part of Story
    Meredith L. Weiss

    04 January 2022

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    Malaysia’s move to extend the franchise to youths aged 18–21 is significant, but is unlikely to have a strong liberalising effect. Several initiatives within civil society illustrate how much more there is to youth political participation than voting.


    Source: Benjamin Sow/Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    THIS MONTH, at the start of 2022, Malaysia’s government is set finally to implement ‘Undi18’ (‘Vote18’), a constitutional amendment that parliament passed in 2019 with unprecedented bipartisan support. The change will enfranchise several million new young voters. Iconic scenes of brave young people from across Asia, championing democracy and resisting authoritarianism, foster an impression of youth as natural liberals – giving rise to speculation that this expansion of the suffrage could push Malaysian politics sharply leftward.

    Reality is far more complicated, as Malaysian experience demonstrates well. Malaysian youth do have a long history of activism, either as youth or students, peaking in the 1960s-70s, or as citizens, including as part of Reformasi protests in the 1990s or the Bersih movement more recently. Much of that activism has been for left-wing or ‘progressive’ causes – but not all.

    Voting: 2018 and Beyond

    Young Malaysians are as divided in ideological and partisan terms as their elders. Elections may not be the most germane place to look for signs of youth-led liberalisation – but voting is also not the only political participation that matters.

    At least as important are initiatives designed to heighten youths’ and other citizens’ sense of political efficacy and create space for critical discourse and engagement. Such efforts foster habits of political participation conducive to democratic praxis.

    In Malaysia’s pivotal 2018 elections, voters under 40 posted the lowest support for the Barisan Nasional (National Front, BN) coalition – ousted from federal power for the first time since independence. Yet, they were hardly united in support for Pakatan Harapan (Alliance of Hope, PH), the reformist coalition that won. A significantly higher share of younger than older Malay voters backed Parti Islam seMalaysia (PAS) instead, suggesting support for an Islamist and Malay-oriented rather than ‘progressive’, noncommunal political vision.

    Indeed, by the time PH collapsed in early 2020, the generation gap had narrowed; young Bumiputera (Malays and other indigenous groups) outpolled their elders in support for the new ‘Malay-unity’ Perikatan Nasional administration. That demographic trends render Malays increasingly numerically dominant will surely magnify these electoral turns, especially as younger voters gain the franchise. This could dramatically reshape electoral patterns.

    It may well be that 20-something MP Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman’s new Malaysian United Democratic Alliance, or MUDA (Youth), is a harbinger of a sharper turn toward noncommunal, progressive politics among Malay youth.

    But if, for instance, the prolonged pandemic leaves young Malays ever more reliant on preferential policies and secure civil-service careers, past experience suggests they may be more inclined to support UMNO and its allies, as a presumed-dependable conduit to those benefits. Or if frustration with corruption further inclines youth toward political Islam, PAS could be the real kingmaker.

    In short, Undi18 will surely matter for electoral outcomes – but not necessarily for advancing noncommunal politics or significant institutional reform.

    Political Activism

    Regardless, youth political activism extends beyond voting. Today’s youth came of age amid expanded avenues for awareness-raising and mobilisation, and of prominent, lively mass movements around core political positions and identities, from free-and-fair elections to Islamism.

    Regardless of their ideological or policy preferences, Malaysian youth are thus acculturated to new ways of approaching politics, making it more likely that they develop and model new habits of participation and enforcing accountability. It is in this sort of activism-beyond-elections, then, that we might see how Malaysian youth are changing politics – regardless of whether or how they vote.

    Youth demonstrate increasing predilection for informal ‘civic’ rather than more formal partisan participation. Among these initiatives are familiar, if still unconventional, undertakings such as boycotts and street demonstrations. Youths have also issued election demands and backed supportive candidates. Particularly important long-term are a subset of lower-key endeavours around political education and socialization.

    These initiatives have been underway for some time, expanding since the 2008 elections. Political parties themselves have organized some, as have non-governmental organizations: varieties of discussion sessions, internship programmes, and similar opportunities, focused less on recruiting new members than on simply engaging youth.

    Groups of (mostly) young people themselves have also found creative ways to inform, motivate, and empower Malaysians, especially youths, toward more active citizenship. In the process, they prepare the ground for longer-term democratization in Malaysia.

    Three Notable Projects

    Three such projects are especially notable both in their own right, and for what they model: the civic education-oriented Youth in Politics (YPolitics); Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia’s (Malaysian Islamic Youth Movement, ABIM) ideological innovation; and the institutional-reform-focused Institute for Political Reform and Democracy (Reform).

    YPolitics:
    Among a set of projects for critical historiography and civic education sits YPolitics. Initiatives around the time of Reformasi jumpstarted these efforts; they have deepened and diversified since. Critical historiography may be invaluable for reframing citizens’ relationship to their polity. YPolitics picks up that thread, defining itself as, ‘a multi-partisan and independent youth-led movement that aims to generate a more politically aware Malaysian youth’.

    Since its launch in June 2020, YPolitics has focused in particular on producing a series of punchy, informative, and accessible issue backgrounders, circulated on social media. Each presents clear explanation, key data, pithy critiques of current praxis and debates, and, where appropriate, personal action steps.

    Topics have included everything from climate change, to the government’s response to Covid-19, to public finance, to sexual harassment. Even when the booklets touch on partisan politics, their goal is plainly to explain, not to persuade. In the process, these efforts take advantage of existing public space to foster better informed, empowered citizens.

    ABIM:
    The pedigree of ABIM is much longer, dating back to the rise of dakwah activism in the early 1970s. Not for the first time, ABIM has taken on ideological reform – now swimming against what would seem a propitious tide for political Islam. ABIM is championing ‘cosmopolitan’ Islamism and multiculturalism, espousing a Bangsa Malaysia, or Malaysian (rather than Malay) nation – historically a trope associated with non-Malay Malaysians.

    This focus for ABIM is part of a larger emphasis it shares with a cluster of fellow youth organisations on civic education to communicate a particular vision for the country – one of unity and cohesion rather than partisan tension.

    This inclusive emphasis echoes earlier phases in which ABIM (and PAS) rhetoric emphasised socioeconomic justice, moderation, and tolerance; ABIM leaders also note their alignment with shifts among the Muslim Brotherhood and Brotherhood-linked Islamist groups globally. ABIM presents this agenda as preparing Malaysia effectively for inclusive governance and effective policymaking.

    Reform:
    Finally, we consider youth-directed efforts at building institutional capacity for democratic governance. A surge in institutional-reform initiatives helped propel PH into office; some continue still. Reform fits squarely among them. Launched in early 2019 as a nonpartisan advocacy group, Reform targets constitutional literacy, education about democracy, parliamentary research, and advocacy, for both politicians and the general public (especially youth, women, and rural communities).

    Unlike many peer organisations, Reform operates mostly in Malay, expanding its reach. Such an initiative is particularly important to democratisation for its emphasis on making sure systems work as they should, and that young people in particular understand those mechanics.

    Longer-Term Shifts

    Taken together, these patterns and programmes recommend attention to longer-term shifts in political socialisation, beyond short-term partisan permutations. This emphasis is not to understate or undervalue young people’s contributions to Malaysian electoral politics: to strengthening political parties, to get-out-the-vote efforts, to creative initiatives to detect electoral malfeasance and hold legislators accountable.

    Yet for liberalisation to take deep root requires more than just successful elections. It requires a commitment to participation, civic awareness and access to policy information, and appreciation for core democratic principles. It is at these deeper levels that the sorts of initiatives profiled here work, sowing seeds rather than reaping harvests of democratisation.

    Its youth are helping to ensure that Malaysia emerges over time better positioned for democratised governance, as rising cohorts expect more than the illiberal status quo.

    About the Author

    Meredith L. Weiss is Professor of Political Science at the Rockefeller College of Public Affairs & Policy, University at Albany, State University of New York. A specialist in the politics of Malaysia and Singapore, she is the author most recently of The Roots of Resilience: Party Machines and Grassroots Politics in Southeast Asia. She contributed this specially to RSIS Commentary.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Religion in Contemporary Society / Global / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    Malaysia’s move to extend the franchise to youths aged 18–21 is significant, but is unlikely to have a strong liberalising effect. Several initiatives within civil society illustrate how much more there is to youth political participation than voting.


    Source: Benjamin Sow/Unsplash

    COMMENTARY

    THIS MONTH, at the start of 2022, Malaysia’s government is set finally to implement ‘Undi18’ (‘Vote18’), a constitutional amendment that parliament passed in 2019 with unprecedented bipartisan support. The change will enfranchise several million new young voters. Iconic scenes of brave young people from across Asia, championing democracy and resisting authoritarianism, foster an impression of youth as natural liberals – giving rise to speculation that this expansion of the suffrage could push Malaysian politics sharply leftward.

    Reality is far more complicated, as Malaysian experience demonstrates well. Malaysian youth do have a long history of activism, either as youth or students, peaking in the 1960s-70s, or as citizens, including as part of Reformasi protests in the 1990s or the Bersih movement more recently. Much of that activism has been for left-wing or ‘progressive’ causes – but not all.

    Voting: 2018 and Beyond

    Young Malaysians are as divided in ideological and partisan terms as their elders. Elections may not be the most germane place to look for signs of youth-led liberalisation – but voting is also not the only political participation that matters.

    At least as important are initiatives designed to heighten youths’ and other citizens’ sense of political efficacy and create space for critical discourse and engagement. Such efforts foster habits of political participation conducive to democratic praxis.

    In Malaysia’s pivotal 2018 elections, voters under 40 posted the lowest support for the Barisan Nasional (National Front, BN) coalition – ousted from federal power for the first time since independence. Yet, they were hardly united in support for Pakatan Harapan (Alliance of Hope, PH), the reformist coalition that won. A significantly higher share of younger than older Malay voters backed Parti Islam seMalaysia (PAS) instead, suggesting support for an Islamist and Malay-oriented rather than ‘progressive’, noncommunal political vision.

    Indeed, by the time PH collapsed in early 2020, the generation gap had narrowed; young Bumiputera (Malays and other indigenous groups) outpolled their elders in support for the new ‘Malay-unity’ Perikatan Nasional administration. That demographic trends render Malays increasingly numerically dominant will surely magnify these electoral turns, especially as younger voters gain the franchise. This could dramatically reshape electoral patterns.

    It may well be that 20-something MP Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman’s new Malaysian United Democratic Alliance, or MUDA (Youth), is a harbinger of a sharper turn toward noncommunal, progressive politics among Malay youth.

    But if, for instance, the prolonged pandemic leaves young Malays ever more reliant on preferential policies and secure civil-service careers, past experience suggests they may be more inclined to support UMNO and its allies, as a presumed-dependable conduit to those benefits. Or if frustration with corruption further inclines youth toward political Islam, PAS could be the real kingmaker.

    In short, Undi18 will surely matter for electoral outcomes – but not necessarily for advancing noncommunal politics or significant institutional reform.

    Political Activism

    Regardless, youth political activism extends beyond voting. Today’s youth came of age amid expanded avenues for awareness-raising and mobilisation, and of prominent, lively mass movements around core political positions and identities, from free-and-fair elections to Islamism.

    Regardless of their ideological or policy preferences, Malaysian youth are thus acculturated to new ways of approaching politics, making it more likely that they develop and model new habits of participation and enforcing accountability. It is in this sort of activism-beyond-elections, then, that we might see how Malaysian youth are changing politics – regardless of whether or how they vote.

    Youth demonstrate increasing predilection for informal ‘civic’ rather than more formal partisan participation. Among these initiatives are familiar, if still unconventional, undertakings such as boycotts and street demonstrations. Youths have also issued election demands and backed supportive candidates. Particularly important long-term are a subset of lower-key endeavours around political education and socialization.

    These initiatives have been underway for some time, expanding since the 2008 elections. Political parties themselves have organized some, as have non-governmental organizations: varieties of discussion sessions, internship programmes, and similar opportunities, focused less on recruiting new members than on simply engaging youth.

    Groups of (mostly) young people themselves have also found creative ways to inform, motivate, and empower Malaysians, especially youths, toward more active citizenship. In the process, they prepare the ground for longer-term democratization in Malaysia.

    Three Notable Projects

    Three such projects are especially notable both in their own right, and for what they model: the civic education-oriented Youth in Politics (YPolitics); Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia’s (Malaysian Islamic Youth Movement, ABIM) ideological innovation; and the institutional-reform-focused Institute for Political Reform and Democracy (Reform).

    YPolitics:
    Among a set of projects for critical historiography and civic education sits YPolitics. Initiatives around the time of Reformasi jumpstarted these efforts; they have deepened and diversified since. Critical historiography may be invaluable for reframing citizens’ relationship to their polity. YPolitics picks up that thread, defining itself as, ‘a multi-partisan and independent youth-led movement that aims to generate a more politically aware Malaysian youth’.

    Since its launch in June 2020, YPolitics has focused in particular on producing a series of punchy, informative, and accessible issue backgrounders, circulated on social media. Each presents clear explanation, key data, pithy critiques of current praxis and debates, and, where appropriate, personal action steps.

    Topics have included everything from climate change, to the government’s response to Covid-19, to public finance, to sexual harassment. Even when the booklets touch on partisan politics, their goal is plainly to explain, not to persuade. In the process, these efforts take advantage of existing public space to foster better informed, empowered citizens.

    ABIM:
    The pedigree of ABIM is much longer, dating back to the rise of dakwah activism in the early 1970s. Not for the first time, ABIM has taken on ideological reform – now swimming against what would seem a propitious tide for political Islam. ABIM is championing ‘cosmopolitan’ Islamism and multiculturalism, espousing a Bangsa Malaysia, or Malaysian (rather than Malay) nation – historically a trope associated with non-Malay Malaysians.

    This focus for ABIM is part of a larger emphasis it shares with a cluster of fellow youth organisations on civic education to communicate a particular vision for the country – one of unity and cohesion rather than partisan tension.

    This inclusive emphasis echoes earlier phases in which ABIM (and PAS) rhetoric emphasised socioeconomic justice, moderation, and tolerance; ABIM leaders also note their alignment with shifts among the Muslim Brotherhood and Brotherhood-linked Islamist groups globally. ABIM presents this agenda as preparing Malaysia effectively for inclusive governance and effective policymaking.

    Reform:
    Finally, we consider youth-directed efforts at building institutional capacity for democratic governance. A surge in institutional-reform initiatives helped propel PH into office; some continue still. Reform fits squarely among them. Launched in early 2019 as a nonpartisan advocacy group, Reform targets constitutional literacy, education about democracy, parliamentary research, and advocacy, for both politicians and the general public (especially youth, women, and rural communities).

    Unlike many peer organisations, Reform operates mostly in Malay, expanding its reach. Such an initiative is particularly important to democratisation for its emphasis on making sure systems work as they should, and that young people in particular understand those mechanics.

    Longer-Term Shifts

    Taken together, these patterns and programmes recommend attention to longer-term shifts in political socialisation, beyond short-term partisan permutations. This emphasis is not to understate or undervalue young people’s contributions to Malaysian electoral politics: to strengthening political parties, to get-out-the-vote efforts, to creative initiatives to detect electoral malfeasance and hold legislators accountable.

    Yet for liberalisation to take deep root requires more than just successful elections. It requires a commitment to participation, civic awareness and access to policy information, and appreciation for core democratic principles. It is at these deeper levels that the sorts of initiatives profiled here work, sowing seeds rather than reaping harvests of democratisation.

    Its youth are helping to ensure that Malaysia emerges over time better positioned for democratised governance, as rising cohorts expect more than the illiberal status quo.

    About the Author

    Meredith L. Weiss is Professor of Political Science at the Rockefeller College of Public Affairs & Policy, University at Albany, State University of New York. A specialist in the politics of Malaysia and Singapore, she is the author most recently of The Roots of Resilience: Party Machines and Grassroots Politics in Southeast Asia. She contributed this specially to RSIS Commentary.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Regionalism and Multilateralism / Religion in Contemporary Society

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info