Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • What Might ASEAN Expect from Biden?
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO20196 | What Might ASEAN Expect from Biden?
    Tan See Seng

    17 November 2020

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    Many observers anticipate major reversals in US foreign policy following Joe Biden’s win in the US presidential election on 3 November 2020. But for the ASEAN region, Biden’s approach will likely be characterised by both change and continuity relative to that of the Trump administration.


    Source: flickr

    COMMENTARY

    WITH JOE Biden touted as the 46th president of the United States – the election result remains under challenge from President Donald Trump on the supposed grounds of electoral fraud – what can ASEAN expect of President-elect Biden’s approach to Asia?

    Biden’s win looks set to reverse the international course taken by Trump and his “America First” platform over the past four years, which largely rejected multilateralism and repudiated the US’ role in international leadership since the end of the Second World War. Going by Biden’s public statements, America’s projected return to the international fold under a Biden administration will likely have key implications for multilateral cooperation on climate change, global public health, global trade, nuclear non-proliferation, human rights and a rules-based international order. However, Biden will first have his hands full restoring America’s standing and credibility with allies and partners alike.

    ASEAN’s Warm Welcome for Biden

    Biden will find ASEAN amenable and welcoming of the US. The ASEAN region went from being “cheaters” in Trump’s perspective – nine of the ten ASEAN member states enjoyed fairly large trade surpluses with the US (the exception being Singapore) – to prospective and somewhat reluctant partners with America in its effort to balance China.

    Incentives like the Asia Reassurance Initiative Act, which authorises up to US$1.5 billion annually through 2023, were implemented to garner the ASEAN region’s support for the US’ “free and open Indo-Pacific” strategy. But with Trump missing ASEAN meetings three years in a row, many regional observers hold the view, fairly or otherwise, that China seems to have gained the upper hand in the ASEAN region – the so-called “ground zero” in the strategic competition between the US and China.

    The perception that the Chinese are winning against the Americans over ASEAN has just been strengthened by the signing of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) at the Association’s recently concluded virtual 37th summit hosted by Vietnam, ASEAN’s current chair. Nearly a decade in the making – talks were launched in 2012 – the RCEP trade deal spans 15 countries and 2.2 billion people, nearly 30 per cent of the world’s population, with a combined GDP of roughly $26 trillion (or nearly 28 per cent of global trade based on 2019 data).

    The fulcrum of this massive trade pact is China, whose economy dwarfs those of its fellow RCEP members. The US is neither in the RCEP nor in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) – of whose earlier incarnation, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), Trump backed the US out.

    Biden’s Expected Pivot towards Asia

    Expect Biden to pivot towards ASEAN as well as Asia more broadly. But the road back in will not be easy. Were the Asians to graciously welcome US participation in their trade pacts, a divided US Congress and the protectionist-minded among the Democrats may still block any attempt by a Biden administration to move in that direction.

    Even then, it is not all doom and gloom for America, which does $2 trillion in trade with the RCEP countries – of which $354 billion was with the ASEAN region in 2019 alone. (By comparison, China’s trade with the ASEAN region was $644 billion for that same year.)  Yet if further rounds of budgetary battles were to ensue thanks to a divided Congress, it is not certain if Biden – like his Democratic predecessors Bill Clinton and Barack Obama – can actively engage with his ASEAN counterparts even if he wanted to.

    Two key areas which ASEAN leaders emphasised at their virtual summit in Hanoi – tensions in the South China Sea and the region’s post-pandemic recovery, respectively – could see differing responses from Biden. His markedly divergent response to that of Trump to the pandemic ravaging America implies he will adopt a cooperative approach globally.

    While he is likely to recommit the US to the World Health Organisation (WHO), with whom the Trump administration had a falling out, it is unclear whether Biden will throw US support behind the COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access Facility (COVAX), where participating countries pool money to offer manufacturers volume guarantees for potential vaccines in order to dissuade any country from hoarding.

    But where ASEAN goes, Biden is likely to increase funding beyond the $87 million the Trump administration has hitherto provided the ASEAN region to combat the pandemic therein. (On its part, China reportedly pledged in May 2020 to include the ASEAN states as prospective beneficiaries of its $2 billion COVID aid package.)

    Biden and South China Sea

    On the other hand, Biden’s stance on the South China Sea is unlikely to deviate from that of his predecessor. Expect him to continue the US’ tough stand against China’s territorial claims. The Obama administration conducted six freedom of navigation operations (FONOPs) in the South China Sea.

    By contrast, the Trump administration has conducted over 20 such operations in the South China Sea, of which nine took place in 2019 alone. While the pace and scope of a Biden administration’s participation in FONOPs in those waters remains to be determined, their intensity is unlikely to be diminished.

    That said, Biden’s readiness to engage with and listen to his ASEAN counterparts will likely temper his security approach to the region by downplaying the robust anti-China orientation of Trump. Much will also depend on leadership within ASEAN itself.

    Arguably, ASEAN’s collective reaffirmation at its June 2020 meeting regarding the 1982 UNCLOS treaty as the basis of sovereign rights and entitlements in the South China Sea might not have happened without Vietnam’s vigorous chairmanship of ASEAN in 2020. Will that kind of institutional leadership be sustained by succeeding chairs in the face of relentless Chinese pressure, and if so, will it be with or without Biden’s support?

    About the Author

    Tan See Seng is Professor of International Relations at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. His most recent books include The Responsibility to Provide in Southeast Asia: Towards an Ethical Explanation (Bristol University Press, 2019) and The Legal Authority of ASEAN as a Security Institution (Cambridge University Press, 2019). This commentary is part of an RSIS Series.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Maritime Security / East Asia and Asia Pacific / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    Many observers anticipate major reversals in US foreign policy following Joe Biden’s win in the US presidential election on 3 November 2020. But for the ASEAN region, Biden’s approach will likely be characterised by both change and continuity relative to that of the Trump administration.


    Source: flickr

    COMMENTARY

    WITH JOE Biden touted as the 46th president of the United States – the election result remains under challenge from President Donald Trump on the supposed grounds of electoral fraud – what can ASEAN expect of President-elect Biden’s approach to Asia?

    Biden’s win looks set to reverse the international course taken by Trump and his “America First” platform over the past four years, which largely rejected multilateralism and repudiated the US’ role in international leadership since the end of the Second World War. Going by Biden’s public statements, America’s projected return to the international fold under a Biden administration will likely have key implications for multilateral cooperation on climate change, global public health, global trade, nuclear non-proliferation, human rights and a rules-based international order. However, Biden will first have his hands full restoring America’s standing and credibility with allies and partners alike.

    ASEAN’s Warm Welcome for Biden

    Biden will find ASEAN amenable and welcoming of the US. The ASEAN region went from being “cheaters” in Trump’s perspective – nine of the ten ASEAN member states enjoyed fairly large trade surpluses with the US (the exception being Singapore) – to prospective and somewhat reluctant partners with America in its effort to balance China.

    Incentives like the Asia Reassurance Initiative Act, which authorises up to US$1.5 billion annually through 2023, were implemented to garner the ASEAN region’s support for the US’ “free and open Indo-Pacific” strategy. But with Trump missing ASEAN meetings three years in a row, many regional observers hold the view, fairly or otherwise, that China seems to have gained the upper hand in the ASEAN region – the so-called “ground zero” in the strategic competition between the US and China.

    The perception that the Chinese are winning against the Americans over ASEAN has just been strengthened by the signing of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) at the Association’s recently concluded virtual 37th summit hosted by Vietnam, ASEAN’s current chair. Nearly a decade in the making – talks were launched in 2012 – the RCEP trade deal spans 15 countries and 2.2 billion people, nearly 30 per cent of the world’s population, with a combined GDP of roughly $26 trillion (or nearly 28 per cent of global trade based on 2019 data).

    The fulcrum of this massive trade pact is China, whose economy dwarfs those of its fellow RCEP members. The US is neither in the RCEP nor in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) – of whose earlier incarnation, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), Trump backed the US out.

    Biden’s Expected Pivot towards Asia

    Expect Biden to pivot towards ASEAN as well as Asia more broadly. But the road back in will not be easy. Were the Asians to graciously welcome US participation in their trade pacts, a divided US Congress and the protectionist-minded among the Democrats may still block any attempt by a Biden administration to move in that direction.

    Even then, it is not all doom and gloom for America, which does $2 trillion in trade with the RCEP countries – of which $354 billion was with the ASEAN region in 2019 alone. (By comparison, China’s trade with the ASEAN region was $644 billion for that same year.)  Yet if further rounds of budgetary battles were to ensue thanks to a divided Congress, it is not certain if Biden – like his Democratic predecessors Bill Clinton and Barack Obama – can actively engage with his ASEAN counterparts even if he wanted to.

    Two key areas which ASEAN leaders emphasised at their virtual summit in Hanoi – tensions in the South China Sea and the region’s post-pandemic recovery, respectively – could see differing responses from Biden. His markedly divergent response to that of Trump to the pandemic ravaging America implies he will adopt a cooperative approach globally.

    While he is likely to recommit the US to the World Health Organisation (WHO), with whom the Trump administration had a falling out, it is unclear whether Biden will throw US support behind the COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access Facility (COVAX), where participating countries pool money to offer manufacturers volume guarantees for potential vaccines in order to dissuade any country from hoarding.

    But where ASEAN goes, Biden is likely to increase funding beyond the $87 million the Trump administration has hitherto provided the ASEAN region to combat the pandemic therein. (On its part, China reportedly pledged in May 2020 to include the ASEAN states as prospective beneficiaries of its $2 billion COVID aid package.)

    Biden and South China Sea

    On the other hand, Biden’s stance on the South China Sea is unlikely to deviate from that of his predecessor. Expect him to continue the US’ tough stand against China’s territorial claims. The Obama administration conducted six freedom of navigation operations (FONOPs) in the South China Sea.

    By contrast, the Trump administration has conducted over 20 such operations in the South China Sea, of which nine took place in 2019 alone. While the pace and scope of a Biden administration’s participation in FONOPs in those waters remains to be determined, their intensity is unlikely to be diminished.

    That said, Biden’s readiness to engage with and listen to his ASEAN counterparts will likely temper his security approach to the region by downplaying the robust anti-China orientation of Trump. Much will also depend on leadership within ASEAN itself.

    Arguably, ASEAN’s collective reaffirmation at its June 2020 meeting regarding the 1982 UNCLOS treaty as the basis of sovereign rights and entitlements in the South China Sea might not have happened without Vietnam’s vigorous chairmanship of ASEAN in 2020. Will that kind of institutional leadership be sustained by succeeding chairs in the face of relentless Chinese pressure, and if so, will it be with or without Biden’s support?

    About the Author

    Tan See Seng is Professor of International Relations at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. His most recent books include The Responsibility to Provide in Southeast Asia: Towards an Ethical Explanation (Bristol University Press, 2019) and The Legal Authority of ASEAN as a Security Institution (Cambridge University Press, 2019). This commentary is part of an RSIS Series.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / Maritime Security

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info