Back
About RSIS
Introduction
Building the Foundations
Welcome Message
Board of Governors
Staff Profiles
Executive Deputy Chairman’s Office
Dean’s Office
Management
Distinguished Fellows
Faculty and Research
Associate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research Analysts
Visiting Fellows
Adjunct Fellows
Administrative Staff
Honours and Awards for RSIS Staff and Students
RSIS Endowment Fund
Endowed Professorships
Career Opportunities
Getting to RSIS
Research
Research Centres
Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)
Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)
Centre of Excellence for National Security
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
Research Programmes
National Security Studies Programme (NSSP)
Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)
Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
Other Research
Future Issues and Technology Cluster
Research@RSIS
Science and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
Graduate Education
Graduate Programmes Office
Exchange Partners and Programmes
How to Apply
Financial Assistance
Meet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other events
RSIS Alumni
Outreach
Global Networks
About Global Networks
RSIS Alumni
Executive Education
About Executive Education
SRP Executive Programme
Terrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
International Programmes
About International Programmes
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)
Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)
International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)
International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
Publications
RSIS Publications
Annual Reviews
Books
Bulletins and Newsletters
RSIS Commentary Series
Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
Commemorative / Event Reports
Future Issues
IDSS Papers
Interreligious Relations
Monographs
NTS Insight
Policy Reports
Working Papers
External Publications
Authored Books
Journal Articles
Edited Books
Chapters in Edited Books
Policy Reports
Working Papers
Op-Eds
Glossary of Abbreviations
Policy-relevant Articles Given RSIS Award
RSIS Publications for the Year
External Publications for the Year
Media
Cohesive Societies
Sustainable Security
Other Resource Pages
News Releases
Speeches
Video/Audio Channel
External Podcasts
Events
Contact Us
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Think Tank and Graduate School Ponder The Improbable Since 1966
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
  • About RSIS
      IntroductionBuilding the FoundationsWelcome MessageBoard of GovernorsHonours and Awards for RSIS Staff and StudentsRSIS Endowment FundEndowed ProfessorshipsCareer OpportunitiesGetting to RSIS
      Staff ProfilesExecutive Deputy Chairman’s OfficeDean’s OfficeManagementDistinguished FellowsFaculty and ResearchAssociate Research Fellows, Senior Analysts and Research AnalystsVisiting FellowsAdjunct FellowsAdministrative Staff
  • Research
      Research CentresCentre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS)Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre)Centre of Excellence for National SecurityInstitute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS)International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)
      Research ProgrammesNational Security Studies Programme (NSSP)Social Cohesion Research Programme (SCRP)Studies in Inter-Religious Relations in Plural Societies (SRP) Programme
      Other ResearchFuture Issues and Technology ClusterResearch@RSISScience and Technology Studies Programme (STSP) (2017-2020)
  • Graduate Education
      Graduate Programmes OfficeExchange Partners and ProgrammesHow to ApplyFinancial AssistanceMeet the Admissions Team: Information Sessions and other eventsRSIS Alumni
  • Outreach
      Global NetworksAbout Global NetworksRSIS Alumni
      Executive EducationAbout Executive EducationSRP Executive ProgrammeTerrorism Analyst Training Course (TATC)
      International ProgrammesAbout International ProgrammesAsia-Pacific Programme for Senior Military Officers (APPSMO)Asia-Pacific Programme for Senior National Security Officers (APPSNO)International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS)International Strategy Forum-Asia (ISF-Asia)
  • Publications
      RSIS PublicationsAnnual ReviewsBooksBulletins and NewslettersRSIS Commentary SeriesCounter Terrorist Trends and AnalysesCommemorative / Event ReportsFuture IssuesIDSS PapersInterreligious RelationsMonographsNTS InsightPolicy ReportsWorking Papers
      External PublicationsAuthored BooksJournal ArticlesEdited BooksChapters in Edited BooksPolicy ReportsWorking PapersOp-Eds
      Glossary of AbbreviationsPolicy-relevant Articles Given RSIS AwardRSIS Publications for the YearExternal Publications for the Year
  • Media
      Cohesive SocietiesSustainable SecurityOther Resource PagesNews ReleasesSpeechesVideo/Audio ChannelExternal Podcasts
  • Events
  • Contact Us
    • Connect with Us

      rsis.ntu
      rsis_ntu
      rsisntu
      rsisvideocast
      school/rsis-ntu
      rsis.sg
      rsissg
      RSIS
      RSS
      Subscribe to RSIS Publications
      Subscribe to RSIS Events

      Getting to RSIS

      Nanyang Technological University
      Block S4, Level B3,
      50 Nanyang Avenue,
      Singapore 639798

      Click here for direction to RSIS

      Get in Touch

    Connect
    Search
    • RSIS
    • Publication
    • RSIS Publications
    • Volodymyr Zelensky at Shangri-La: Strategising Candid Multilateralism
    • Annual Reviews
    • Books
    • Bulletins and Newsletters
    • RSIS Commentary Series
    • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    • Commemorative / Event Reports
    • Future Issues
    • IDSS Papers
    • Interreligious Relations
    • Monographs
    • NTS Insight
    • Policy Reports
    • Working Papers

    CO24072 | Volodymyr Zelensky at Shangri-La: Strategising Candid Multilateralism
    Alan Chong

    04 June 2024

    download pdf

    SYNOPSIS

    The 2024 Shangri-La Dialogue was remarkable for drawing attention to the power of multilateralism in promoting dialogue that draws together the links between an interconnected global and Asian security equation. At the same time, by serving as a platform for candid exchanges about threats to national sovereignty and territorial integrity, it drives home the point that participating states are no longer bystanders in international relations. The violation of these for any state will have security implications for others.

    image from rawpixel id 6918348 original
    Source: Rawpixel

    COMMENTARY

    The twenty-first edition of the Shangri-La Dialogue, held from 31 May to 2 June 2024 in Singapore, was memorable for being a bellwether not only for Asian tensions but also global ones.

    Sino-US fractures were on full display, with Chinese Defence Minister Dong Jun warning that separatist forces were eroding peaceful relations across the Taiwan Straits.

    US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin was mostly tight-lipped about the productivity of his bilateral meeting with his Chinese counterpart. Indonesia’s Defence Minister and President-elect, Prabowo Subianto, made explicit his country’s peace plan for the Gaza Strip, including the framework of a two-state solution and Indonesia’s willingness to provide peacekeeping and humanitarian relief forces as part of that solution.

    In fact, this round of the Shangri-La Dialogue reiterated the primacy of statehood and territorial integrity, even when Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Junior referenced Chinese predatory actions in the South China Sea without naming the Asian power.

    What probably captured the headlines was Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s surprise visit to address the final day of the dialogue. His remarks were unambiguously crafted to draw the link between the security of sovereign states and the Shangri-La Dialogue’s long-established focus on the scale of threats to Asia’s security.

    The Interconnectedness of Global Security

    Multilateralism, as embodied by participating states of the Shangri-La Dialogue, is very much tethered to their ability to sound sirens when they are confronted by dire threats. As Singapore’s Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen put it, the dialogue serves its purpose if the very basic idea of communication is practised.

    State representatives candidly say what they believe is just. Their governments may disagree with one another, but this is what prevents an escalation toward worsening tensions or a preventable escalation into armed hostilities.

    Zelensky’s pitch was simply to remind Asian governments that a neighbouring state’s use of brute force compromised his country’s sovereignty. This resonated with the purpose of the Shangri-La Dialogue.

    In his remarks at the press conference that followed his speech, the Ukrainian leader refused to be drawn into commenting directly on China’s policy towards Taiwan or Taipei’s international status but insisted that in general, every state is entitled to protect its territorial integrity. That spoke volumes in terms of reminding all attendees that a rules-based order was under siege worldwide.

    Pleading the Common Cause, Wooing the Bystander

    Another prominent feature of Zelensky’s mission at the Shangri-La Dialogue was to publicise the need for Asia to attend the upcoming Ukraine Peace Conference hosted by Switzerland later this month. This seemed simple and polite enough until Zelensky drew attention to how some Asian states, as well as non-Asian ones, were being pressured by Russia to boycott the Switzerland meeting.

    To attend is to signal that states that valued sovereignty, self-determination, and territorial integrity would stand with Ukraine in discussing the terms for a just and restorative peace that respects Kyiv’s original borders.

    Zelensky also challenged Asian states to stand up against intimidation as an undesirable practice in international relations. In this vein, he suggested that China was supplying arms to Russia to fight Ukraine based on his access to intelligence sources from the West and from his own country. However, he clarified that some of this aid to the Russian war effort was inadvertent as it arose from slippages in the monitoring of technology exports.

    He called on all states present at the 2024 Shangri-La Dialogue to help end the Russia-Ukraine war by denying Moscow warfighting material. In tandem, he highlighted the dramatic scenes of humanitarian suffering in his country, making the point, in true Shangri-La spirit, that diplomatic frankness was crucial to thwarting war or cutting off the “oxygen” that fuels conflicts.

    Predictably, the Chinese delegation clarified that China sided neither with Ukraine nor Russia in their conflict and was only on the side of peace and dialogue.

    At the Shangri-La Dialogue, there are no more bystanders; Zelensky’s presence – complete with his trademark military green vest and combat slacks – and thinly veiled remarks about securing territorial integrity, are telling Asian powers, as well as their friends from the EU, US and Australia, that Asian security matters are also connected to global security parameters.

    Singapore’s defence minister chimed in, stating that the world cannot afford a third polarising geopolitical conflict. In these senses, Zelensky’s visit has delivered an indubitable word punch.

    Asian states and the great powers are witnessing an open call to avoid a disastrous future security disorder. If frank words and thinly veiled warnings amount to a testy multilateralism, then it would have served its purpose if it retards or ends a war.

    About the Author

    Dr Alan Chong is a Senior Fellow in the Centre for Multilateralism Studies, at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / Regionalism and Multilateralism / East Asia and Asia Pacific / Europe / South Asia / Southeast Asia and ASEAN / Global
    comments powered by Disqus

    SYNOPSIS

    The 2024 Shangri-La Dialogue was remarkable for drawing attention to the power of multilateralism in promoting dialogue that draws together the links between an interconnected global and Asian security equation. At the same time, by serving as a platform for candid exchanges about threats to national sovereignty and territorial integrity, it drives home the point that participating states are no longer bystanders in international relations. The violation of these for any state will have security implications for others.

    image from rawpixel id 6918348 original
    Source: Rawpixel

    COMMENTARY

    The twenty-first edition of the Shangri-La Dialogue, held from 31 May to 2 June 2024 in Singapore, was memorable for being a bellwether not only for Asian tensions but also global ones.

    Sino-US fractures were on full display, with Chinese Defence Minister Dong Jun warning that separatist forces were eroding peaceful relations across the Taiwan Straits.

    US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin was mostly tight-lipped about the productivity of his bilateral meeting with his Chinese counterpart. Indonesia’s Defence Minister and President-elect, Prabowo Subianto, made explicit his country’s peace plan for the Gaza Strip, including the framework of a two-state solution and Indonesia’s willingness to provide peacekeeping and humanitarian relief forces as part of that solution.

    In fact, this round of the Shangri-La Dialogue reiterated the primacy of statehood and territorial integrity, even when Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Junior referenced Chinese predatory actions in the South China Sea without naming the Asian power.

    What probably captured the headlines was Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s surprise visit to address the final day of the dialogue. His remarks were unambiguously crafted to draw the link between the security of sovereign states and the Shangri-La Dialogue’s long-established focus on the scale of threats to Asia’s security.

    The Interconnectedness of Global Security

    Multilateralism, as embodied by participating states of the Shangri-La Dialogue, is very much tethered to their ability to sound sirens when they are confronted by dire threats. As Singapore’s Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen put it, the dialogue serves its purpose if the very basic idea of communication is practised.

    State representatives candidly say what they believe is just. Their governments may disagree with one another, but this is what prevents an escalation toward worsening tensions or a preventable escalation into armed hostilities.

    Zelensky’s pitch was simply to remind Asian governments that a neighbouring state’s use of brute force compromised his country’s sovereignty. This resonated with the purpose of the Shangri-La Dialogue.

    In his remarks at the press conference that followed his speech, the Ukrainian leader refused to be drawn into commenting directly on China’s policy towards Taiwan or Taipei’s international status but insisted that in general, every state is entitled to protect its territorial integrity. That spoke volumes in terms of reminding all attendees that a rules-based order was under siege worldwide.

    Pleading the Common Cause, Wooing the Bystander

    Another prominent feature of Zelensky’s mission at the Shangri-La Dialogue was to publicise the need for Asia to attend the upcoming Ukraine Peace Conference hosted by Switzerland later this month. This seemed simple and polite enough until Zelensky drew attention to how some Asian states, as well as non-Asian ones, were being pressured by Russia to boycott the Switzerland meeting.

    To attend is to signal that states that valued sovereignty, self-determination, and territorial integrity would stand with Ukraine in discussing the terms for a just and restorative peace that respects Kyiv’s original borders.

    Zelensky also challenged Asian states to stand up against intimidation as an undesirable practice in international relations. In this vein, he suggested that China was supplying arms to Russia to fight Ukraine based on his access to intelligence sources from the West and from his own country. However, he clarified that some of this aid to the Russian war effort was inadvertent as it arose from slippages in the monitoring of technology exports.

    He called on all states present at the 2024 Shangri-La Dialogue to help end the Russia-Ukraine war by denying Moscow warfighting material. In tandem, he highlighted the dramatic scenes of humanitarian suffering in his country, making the point, in true Shangri-La spirit, that diplomatic frankness was crucial to thwarting war or cutting off the “oxygen” that fuels conflicts.

    Predictably, the Chinese delegation clarified that China sided neither with Ukraine nor Russia in their conflict and was only on the side of peace and dialogue.

    At the Shangri-La Dialogue, there are no more bystanders; Zelensky’s presence – complete with his trademark military green vest and combat slacks – and thinly veiled remarks about securing territorial integrity, are telling Asian powers, as well as their friends from the EU, US and Australia, that Asian security matters are also connected to global security parameters.

    Singapore’s defence minister chimed in, stating that the world cannot afford a third polarising geopolitical conflict. In these senses, Zelensky’s visit has delivered an indubitable word punch.

    Asian states and the great powers are witnessing an open call to avoid a disastrous future security disorder. If frank words and thinly veiled warnings amount to a testy multilateralism, then it would have served its purpose if it retards or ends a war.

    About the Author

    Dr Alan Chong is a Senior Fellow in the Centre for Multilateralism Studies, at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

    Categories: RSIS Commentary Series / Country and Region Studies / International Politics and Security / Regionalism and Multilateralism

    Popular Links

    About RSISResearch ProgrammesGraduate EducationPublicationsEventsAdmissionsCareersVideo/Audio ChannelRSIS Intranet

    Connect with Us

    rsis.ntu
    rsis_ntu
    rsisntu
    rsisvideocast
    school/rsis-ntu
    rsis.sg
    rsissg
    RSIS
    RSS
    Subscribe to RSIS Publications
    Subscribe to RSIS Events

    Getting to RSIS

    Nanyang Technological University
    Block S4, Level B3,
    50 Nanyang Avenue,
    Singapore 639798

    Click here for direction to RSIS

    Get in Touch

      Copyright © S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. All rights reserved.
      Privacy Statement / Terms of Use
      Help us improve

        Rate your experience with this website
        123456
        Not satisfiedVery satisfied
        What did you like?
        0/255 characters
        What can be improved?
        0/255 characters
        Your email
        Please enter a valid email.
        Thank you for your feedback.
        This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to the use of cookies on your device as described in our privacy policy. Learn more
        OK
        Latest Book
        more info